Been going through that last hand in my head and I really should have been able to put it down.
The villain either has nothing or a set minimum. Assuming he has nothing his shove would mean he thought I didn't have an A or a K, which is unlikely. If this was the scenario and I'd have called he'd have dropped from first to last place. Much more likely that he's assuming I do have A or K and he's expecting the call.
To put it more simply. At this point in the hand he must know I either have aces, or A,K. So if he's betting he must have a set.
I should have been thinking less about what I had and more about why he was making the bet.
Edited by zeroster (20 September 2012 @ 21:27 GMT)
|
