Joined: Mar '11
Location: Canada
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 1490
Okay, it's one thing to insult someone, but an entirely different issue to utter threats. There's no room for this crap here, this is supposed to be a community. Reported you red, perhaps a timeout will help you re-assess your attitude. I encourage everyone to refrain from replying as it'll just make things worse.
Posted by sadamman: If you must know, I was the first one to thumb down the OP. I done this for a laugh because your a tit. Then other people obviously find it funny to thumb you down also.
Yeah retribution said a load of bla-bla-bla, whats the point in calling 3,4 in the first place if your not prepared to go all in when you flop two pair. What were you expecting, to flop a straight, a flush, or a full house? Not very likely. Are those the only hands you'd call the all in on? If they're the only times you'd ever really call it, what was the point in wasting so many chips when you could fold pre flop.
Spot on.. if you are going to play hands then play them aggressively. By just limping you are relying on hitting the big flop, which in this case happened, but the betting was still far too small.
I would have hit the flop far bigger, and put him under real pressure. An 800 chip bet was way too small given the BB was given a free shot at the blinds.
Either go for the pot or fold. Limping with hands like 3-4 is a recipe for disaster.
For you its a recipe for disaster yes but for me limping in with hands in position is profitable because these hands have what we call in poker ""implied odds"" which can sometimes make big enough hands to stack people. For you its a recipe for disaster because folding top pair top kicker or better is an impossibility. And since i have massive postflop edge over you its ok. I pride myself to be able to get value from when i make big hands, bluff my opponents when the opportunity arises, and make the discipline folds when need be like on this instance.
And if you read the hand carefully you would see i was on the one who was bet into not him. There you go again posting on my threads without reading them which is indicative of a troll.Also, we can also assume your the type of player who bluffs because they think they can get their opponents to fold a better hand not because they have represented this hand. Your the type of player who when value betting bets because he thinks he has the best hand taking no consideration what your opponment range and your perceived range and sizing your bets accordingly. You get my grip because by the looks of it it described you nicely by what you say. Any idiot can play preflop well as it is pretty much solved per say.
However, postflop play requires analytically minded thinking taking into account many factors such as board texture, hand strength, meta game history, your opponents range, your perceived range, maximizing value, thin value betting, bluffing, bluff inducing, player types, betting patterns, gameflow factors, disciplined folds all in a vacuum. Anyway i am done posting here as the trolls will invetiable be back because they care about me a lot which is sad to say but true.
Can I just say, what an arrogant, ill informed and completely stupid idiot of a person you are.
You think you are some kind of poker genius, but you've on here trying to scrap together free bankrolls and posting to get a few points to get some money to play with.
You play in $1 games, then sit there talking about your ability. If you had ability you'd be playing at far higher stakes. The problem is, as this and your other threads show. You are an absolute idiot at a poker table and if you went to the higher stakes you'd be eaten alive.
You're a joke, and every post you make makes you look a bigger idiot. If I were you I'd shut up..
------------
Posted by schmoyster: Redvulture61, this is a weird thread you got here. You post a hand for discussion and then you start insulting people which do not agree with your line of play. What's the point You want to see only posts that praise you for playing like that When you discuss hands, you sound like somebody who has learned David Sklansky's books by heart. The terminology you use is from the vocabulary of poker pros. But IMHO you use your knowledge in the wrong place. On micro-limits, where you play, there are only two major rules: 1) You ALMOST NEVER can bluff opponent out of the pot 2) You ALMOST NEVER can figure out what your opponent is holding Except the cases when you have a lot of notes on your opponent. So, I suggest you to stop torturing your brain by trying to play against micro-donks as if they are poker pros. Look at the hand you posted... You limped with 34 suited. I don't agree with this limp but what is done is done. You flop 2-pair, which is a killer hand on micro limits. And you passively chase it to the river only to make a "discipline fold" because you still couldn't figure out what your opponent was holding (see rule 2 above). Maybe Sklansky would praise you for this line of play but your opponent was probably laughing at you with his KQo. I want to repeat myself, maybe your knowledge of poker theory is really profound but you use it in the wrong place and in the wrong manner. Your results from Sharkscope and OPR prove it.
Well said. However I take issue with one thing you've said
"So, I suggest you to stop torturing your brain by trying to play against micro-donks as if they are poker pros."
You actually assume this idiot has got a brain which his posts clearly prove is not the case..
You want to see only posts that praise you for playing like that 
