It's impossible to come to a statistical conclusion with small samples and personal opinions/observations... To convince me you would need to see millons of flops and prove that there is too many suited board
I know players have done it for other sites, but I don't know if players did it for partypoker. It would be nice to be able to test a RNG ourselves.
Joined: May '09
Location: Croatia
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 20429
as I see in last months,on party poker you can get easy 4 of kind at tables,tournaments or cash games!I have never seen so much quads on any site!even poker stars didnt give and I am there registered much before then on party poker!
Joined: Jun '13
Location: Canada
Age: 80 (M)
Posts: 3700
Posted by TheMachineQC: It's impossible to come to a statistical conclusion with small samples and personal opinions/observations... To convince me you would need to see millons of flops and prove that there is too many suited board
I know players have done it for other sites, but I don't know if players did it for partypoker. It would be nice to be able to test a RNG ourselves.
I never said that it was a statistic my question was only if i was right to say that IMO there were more suited flop and four suited board then before.
An i like very much the IQA answer i think she is right it is only because i am just minding to that.
Joined: Oct '08
Location: Germany
Age: 49 (M)
Posts: 2025
Posted by pinotte:
Posted by TheMachineQC: It's impossible to come to a statistical conclusion with small samples and personal opinions/observations... To convince me you would need to see millons of flops and prove that there is too many suited board
I know players have done it for other sites, but I don't know if players did it for partypoker. It would be nice to be able to test a RNG ourselves.
I never said that it was a statistic my question was only if i was right to say that IMO there were more suited flop and four suited board then before.
An i like very much the IQA answer i think she is right it is only because i am just minding to that.
it depends..
from a psycholigical point of view, you could say she´s right. but philosophical, or lets this (i dont remember the right quotation right now but i think this will do it): sometimes the simpliest explanation is the right one. or: if something looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck. so your perception could be simply right.
i havent played for a long time on PP and only for a short time. but just like dule-vu said, i have never seen so many quads in that short time of play.
depends on how you shuffle the cards. the casino´s goal is to generate rake. if i was a casino owner i would shuffle the cards the way to have alot action on table, also that weaker players could hit now and then with only a few outs. just like online or offline games. the programmers do not make a to hard level of difficult, else the players who do not often play games will simply quit playing or stop buying certain games. they wanna reach the "mass" and not only a few hardcore or passionated players. the more CD´s they sell the more money.
im not a "rigged in someones favour rigtard" but "shuffled to have more action on table" tard
just keep the losing player happy by letting him win now and then. and ka-ching, he will deposit again to try his luck once more. otherwise he wouldnt.
Joined: Nov '14
Location: Macedonia, The former Yugoslav Republic of
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 1169
What ever the case is with PP and their random card generator, trust me buddy is nothing like the one on Jokestars, jeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzaaaaaaaaaaaassssssssssss i hate that place... I plan to transfer everything i have from FT on PS and then to my neteller acc. and after that to put it on PP, so i play a lot on PP now a days, and my plan is to get familiar with the software as much as i can, since i plan to replace FT with PP, coz i faking hate jokestars, assssholes faking asssholes for killing my FT room So, yeah, i did notice more suited flops, but trust me its not bad as on JOKESTARS
