English flag   Dansk (danish) flag     (05:51 GMT)
 
Username   Password  

BankrollMob Christmas logo  
Free no deposit poker bonuses Reviews Bankrolls - Free No Deposit Offers Poker Forum News: Poker, Casino, Betting & Bingo Sport Bets Poker Freerolls & Tournaments Xmas Offers Support & FAQ
transparent separator

BankrollMob Forum

BankrollMob Forum » Hand Histories » 99 VS 2 PLAYERS

New Thread Forums Search Subscriptions Bookmarks

  9-Jul-16, 16:10   #1
99 VS 2 PLAYERS 0 
FreeChips4YO 
Joined: Dec '13
Location: Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
Age: 22 (M)
Posts: 25
well guys i think i play this hand very very passive maybe the call preflop is okey but in the flop maybe i could re raise well that i think

what u guys think of this?

http://www.boomplayer.com/poker-hands/Boom/18293348_3F0...

please tell me what u guys were made.

     
  9-Jul-16, 17:41   #2
  0 
IceQueenAce 
Joined: Feb '13
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 40 (F)
Posts: 2196
possibly a re-raise on flop but that would be only marginally +ev

as played, I cant find much wrong with the hand.


     
  9-Jul-16, 18:06   #3
  0 
Ingrind33 

Joined: Sep '15
Location: Netherlands
Age: 34 (F)
Posts: 536
To call with two nines is always risky.

Also the more people are in the hand, the bigger chance you have to lose it. So rather play against 1 opponent, in this case you see risky overcards even though you hit 3 of a kind.

But like I said, on the long run and most of the times wont hit nice trips or there are higher cards at the flop, so it is always risky to play with 99. It totally depends what fase you are in the tournament/what position/skill level of opponent etc etc..

Good luck in the tables

     
  9-Jul-16, 20:01   #4
  0 
Tony_MON7ANA 

Joined: Mar '14
Location: Japan
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 4119
Almost every player at the table had around 125-bb or more in chips on level 3. You (danydave) had 194-bb, the deepest stack.
It would put you in a really awkward situation if the 3-bettor (player 7) elect to 5-bet (and shove) after you 4-bet with 99 from small blind. So, I think flat-calling pre-flop was ok and I would take the same line on three post-flop streets (K/C, K/C, K/C (or K/F)).
I guess the player 6 had KJ or KT, and the player 7 had AK?

Edited by Tony_MON7ANA (Saturday, July 09, 2016 @ 20:13 GMT)


     
  10-Jul-16, 08:59   #5
  0 
doubletop777 
Joined: Mar '11
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 47 (M)
Posts: 5552
I would have definitely raised after the flop. I think you would have got at least one customer with a big re-raise. You let them get to the river very cheaply, in my opinion, but at least it worked out all good in the end

     
  10-Jul-16, 14:45   #6
  0 
pajalnick 

Joined: Mar '11
Location: Russian Federation
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 2682
if I played this game, I would have done rireyz after any bets against me ... maybe I say that because I had seen the hand completely ... maybe ... I understand that you wanted to hide his strong hand ... probably should rejoice small, then large enough

     
  10-Jul-16, 17:18   #7
  0 
skullp0k3r 

Joined: Jul '14
Location: Brazil
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 89

3-bet pre-flop could have been a great alternative to your move. unfortunately the board allowed several other possibilities that hampered his raise on the river, and you could easily have lost his hand for showing weakness in pre flop call.
any other player who had bluffed on the river would force you to fold. lucky for you that was not the case. Cool Cool

     
BankrollMob Forum » Hand Histories » 99 VS 2 PLAYERS

 
Forum Rules | Support & FAQ

© 2016 BankrollMob.com - All Rights Reserved CONTACT | ABOUT | PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS & CONDITIONS | NEWSLETTERS | AFFILIATES | REPORT SPAM | ADVERTISING
  Bookmark and Share