| doomdy | 17/12/2008 13:44:53 GMT |
| I think he can make more money with less tables and a limit higher....
|
| Predobar | 17/12/2008 14:03:24 GMT |
| He can win money, after all he has stats to prove that but that is not poker. That`s some math game with elements of multilevel marketing. Numbers over quality.
|
| M3turbo | 17/12/2008 15:04:40 GMT |
Predobar spot on.
Can this guy prove his results when I sharkscope him he has $16K profit, not $107K.
------------
Posted by Whiskerer:
Sure someone could beat him at maybe even 8 tables, at which point he is still killing at 17 tables, so imo he's still got you. |
You got something wrong out of 43 tables he is killing none of them he is playing str8 forward and living of people mistakes which there are plenty of at 6$ tables. He doesn't dominate(killing) any of the tables, more like marginal winner but with the extreme number of tables it turns into cash.
|
| MANUEDO | 17/12/2008 15:43:05 GMT |
Is it all real ?
And the interview is real too ?
Which poker magazine was made this interview on ?
Who was the interviewer ?
|
| Whiskerer | 17/12/2008 15:53:26 GMT |
| Regardless of semantics, my point remains valid, you can maybe beat him on a few tables, but that is still a minority of what he is playing. Besides, it seems you have got something wrong, sharkscope only covers tournaments.
|
| shokaku | 17/12/2008 17:05:00 GMT |
Posted by doomdy:
I think he can make more money with less tables and a limit higher.... |
Maybe. But with higher variance too. With so many tables a bad beat or two is of no big influence to the results.
|
| M3turbo | 17/12/2008 17:33:15 GMT |
Posted by Whiskerer:
Regardless of semantics, my point remains valid, you can maybe beat him on a few tables, but that is still a minority of what he is playing. Besides, it seems you have got something wrong, sharkscope only covers tournaments. |
Nothing wrong here, I asked if he could prove his results cause sharkscope only said $16K and as I understand it his maingame is 6$ S&G.
I'll cut it out for you so you understand. When I ask if he can prove it, it meens has anyone seen any evidence of these results if not from sharkscope then graphs from HEM/PT.
|
| GamblinDemon | 17/12/2008 18:44:46 GMT |
My records is 12 tables in the mean time but i had a lot of troubles because i organized them all next to each other so they were sooo smal... i think the best option is to have 2 30" monitors 
|
| eltuga007 | 18/12/2008 04:12:04 GMT |
| wow 43 tables omg is genial
|
| doomdy | 18/12/2008 10:32:41 GMT |
| I dont see why he is a genius ??
|
| shokaku | 18/12/2008 16:53:52 GMT |
Posted by doomdy:
I dont see why he is a genius ?? |
Winning $100.000 + at such low levels? Not that easy. But you have to be a leatherass (or a bot) to do it.
|
| doomdy | 19/12/2008 09:09:33 GMT |
Posted by shokaku: Posted by doomdy:
I dont see why he is a genius ?? |
Winning $100.000 + at such low levels? Not that easy. But you have to be a leatherass (or a bot) to do it. |
Yes true lot of money 100K 
But is he a good poker player? Dont know. He definitly make more money as i do with poker 
|
| DUDEHIGHLAND | 19/12/2008 15:32:41 GMT |
| dos he have 20 pair of hands and 10 pc with 10 monitors??
|
| tim2012 | 22/12/2008 01:19:01 GMT |
| this smells like bullshit if you ask me 43 tables man i mean..come on with 4 you go crazy cause when you want to raise with one the other comes..and another so 43 seems impossible to me can't be done trust me.....
|
| DoffR | 22/12/2008 15:50:05 GMT |
| Ofc it can be don tim2012. Many players does that. They play very very few hands.
|
| Rasmusbre | 25/12/2008 21:43:58 GMT |
I dont think its possible to make that good a bot. If you have a Bot you will win some if you are lucky - but in the long run you will lose?
Havent heard of a bot that works anyways =)
|
| Calmplay | 25/12/2008 21:59:45 GMT |
Obviously both  I don't think he's a human being as no human can master 43 tables at the same time in poker & the worst make a profit of 100k. Come on ... 
|
| intentcity4 | 26/12/2008 09:28:17 GMT |
| i dont think its possible to play that many tables, if it were possible the tables would have to be 10 seaters which he may do, but it has to be a bot, are bots legal??
|
| dunotra | 26/12/2008 09:46:03 GMT |
Posted by intentcity4:
i dont think its possible to play that many tables, if it were possible the tables would have to be 10 seaters which he may do, but it has to be a bot, are bots legal?? |
Yeh 43 tables dos sound a bit unbelivble, I tried 4 once and i could not keep up with them and bot's are not legal on most sites. Poker stars have a list of band software on there site. But some of the bots have ingenus ways of clocking them selfs. had a look at one a few weeks back and to make it look human it even chated in the chat box to outher player's just thing's like nh gh things like that.
Even SharkScope band on Stars now I think
|
| BDD420 | 01/01/2009 19:55:20 GMT |
| Well tourneys is easy I used to play 5 or 6 cash tables at once 1/2 2/4 blinds, Tom Dwan plays 8 heads up tables at once 400/800 etc.. But while i was playing i seen lots of ppl playin up to 10 12 tables at once, they only play top hands AQ or better etc.. So its not really that hard with 2 or 3 monitors. You lose the ability to read most of your players and notice paterns but you are destined to win if you keep playin K's and A's etc..
|
| silentcell | 02/01/2009 03:31:05 GMT |
| total fkn bullshit.the guys prolly some freak of a pinhead who has no life.
|
| doomdy | 02/01/2009 08:49:34 GMT |
Posted by silentcell:
total fkn bullshit.the guys prolly some freak of a pinhead who has no life. |
Yes he has a life with money 
Not for me so much tables but hey nice money
|
| T3ddyKGB | 02/01/2009 13:00:49 GMT |
if the pokerroom hasnt much traffic and you see 3-4 players at several tables then you can calculate what hands they gonna play. i was also playin 4 tables at once and had alot fun vs this guys. i just checked on which table they focus right now ( by delays) so i was often able to know when i may bluff raise at a certain table because i knew hes focusing on another table (which i was delayin lol - he waited for me to call/raise his huge bet). this has not much to do with poker, but i had alot fun that day
|
| shokaku | 02/01/2009 13:12:32 GMT |
Posted by T3ddyKGB: if the pokerroom hasnt much traffic and you see 3-4 players at several tables then you can calculate what hands they gonna play. i was also playin 4 tables at once and had alot fun vs this guys. i just checked on which table they focus right now ( by delays) so i was often able to know when i may bluff raise at a certain table because i knew hes focusing on another table (which i was delayin lol - he waited for me to call/raise his huge bet). this has not much to do with poker, but i had alot fun that day |
Hehe. Playing the player for the win.
|
| BluffOnly | 06/01/2009 02:51:33 GMT |
I was sitting at his table, in the 30k guarenteed tournament
here's his last hand:
PokerStars Spil #23615278905: Turnering#131676609, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (200/400) - 06/01/2009 3:26:15 CET [05/01/2009 21:26:15 ET]
Bord '131676609 47' 9-max Knappen er på plads #1
Plads 1: milesaway558 (6332 i chips)
Plads 2: Luckyluch86 (12979 i chips)
Plads 3: Maestro773 (9910 i chips)
Plads 4: zach0984 (9295 i chips)
Plads 5: MightyBman (4400 i chips)
Plads 6: MAOSFRIAS (11887 i chips)
Plads 7: *Bluff Kidd* (29453 i chips)
Plads 8: poorlittlegu (19265 i chips)
Plads 9: Beretta20ga (6602 i chips)
milesaway558: poster ante 50
Luckyluch86: poster ante 50
Maestro773: poster ante 50
zach0984: poster ante 50
MightyBman: poster ante 50
MAOSFRIAS: poster ante 50
*Bluff Kidd*: poster ante 50
poorlittlegu: poster ante 50
Beretta20ga: poster ante 50
Luckyluch86: poster small blind 200
Maestro773: poster big blind 400
*** KORT ***
Givet til *Bluff Kidd* [5d Ks]
zach0984: folder
MightyBman: folder
MAOSFRIAS: folder
*Bluff Kidd*: folder
poorlittlegu: folder
Beretta20ga: folder
milesaway558: raiser 5882 til 6282 og er all-in
Luckyluch86: kalder 6082
Maestro773: folder
*** FLOP *** [Kh Tc 6c]
*** TURN *** [Kh Tc 6c] 
*** RIVER *** [Kh Tc 6c Kd] 
*** SHOWDOWN ***
Luckyluch86: viser [Ac 5c] (et par, konger)
milesaway558: viser [Qc Jh] (et par, konger - lavere kicker)
Luckyluch86 vandt 13414 fra potten
*** RESUMÈ ***
Pot i alt: 13414 | Rake 0
Bord [Kh Tc 6c Kd 2h]
Plads 1: milesaway558 (knap) viste [Qc Jh] og tabte med et par, konger
Plads 2: Luckyluch86 (small blind) viste [Ac 5c] og vandt (13414) med et par, konger
Plads 3: Maestro773 (big blind) foldede før flop
Plads 4: zach0984 foldede før flop (bettede ikke)
Plads 5: MightyBman foldede før flop (bettede ikke)
Plads 6: MAOSFRIAS foldede før flop (bettede ikke)
Plads 7: *Bluff Kidd* foldede før flop (bettede ikke)
Plads 8: poorlittlegu foldede før flop (bettede ikke)
Plads 9: Beretta20ga foldede før flop (bettede ikke)
|
