Joined: Dec '08
Age: 62 (M)
1 When accusations are made in a thread about a specific member,clear proof should be given immediatly or the post / thread will be removed. 2 In serious cases potential new threads can be discussed with ADMIN through support or @bankrollmob.com, before posting.
This is what came up after all the fuzz that shouldn't be dealt with the way it was.
Do you agree with my opinion that accusation can be made WITHOUT naming the person before proof is given and ADMIN agrees the name can be mentioned, or do you think i'm a moron and we can throw mud here at whoever the f**k we like?
Joined: Jan '09
Age: 51 (M)
I think the problem is always the same: how can u give real proof on the internet? copy and paste chat e-mail or everything else?--- easy to write by yourself screenshot of pokeraccont or ewallet etc?---photoshop
contacting admin is always a good idea, for the new rule......the poll will surely help us
Joined: Jan '08
Age: 44 (M)
There is admin who can say what is right and not right, he is payed to do that and in these times of recession it would not be nice to take the food out of his mouth.
On the other hand, yes this is about Flangel, I don`t trust him. I would not go that far if monamil hasnt started pointing fingers at him to actually look around and from what ive found he is related to iphone sales, he was trying to sell some other stuff on other forums and from stats i gathered and hands ive seen replayed hes not that good player either. In the end, if someone did not came here and make initial accusation, with proof or without the proof, someone would have to get scammed before we could realize what is happening and what if the person who got scammed could not provide a proof? Wait till someone actually gets one. No one is getting sentenced to life in prison here so it should be free to speak whatever we want to a certain point. If you can go through BRM registration process it means that you posses qualifying IQ for self conclusion.
Joined: Feb '08
Age: 61 (M)
what is going on here ? do you warn your teacher are the direction when someone has being cheating during examination ? don't think so ! Let BRM as it is at this point and let admin decide for themselves what is allowed and what is not allowed ! and as about flangel ... i will not defend him but as i told before ... let us judge ourselves firstly before we judge other people around here !
Joined: Nov '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 45 (M)
Posted by umarplus: on the one hand: yes totally!
on the other hand: nay. lets not overreact. this was oen exception and i do enjoy this forum is not ?gulated.
also props to admin for always beeing there in time to take appropriate action. dude has a lot of tact imo
Yeaah No point in over complicating things Anything OTT can be taken down by admin and there on the ball most of the time , things dont get left on for age's.... Lets not get silly none of us are children
Joined: Mar '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 42 (M)
No new rules needed IMO, admins got nothing better to do . 1. would mean that anyone suspicious about a person would not be able to tell outhers as he/she would be banned, proof is not always needed just friendly advice with a be carefull. 2. Admins got nothing better to why not LOL, nah.. FK PC