Joined: May '08
Age: 50 (M)
i like the merge software big bet,reefer and so on think pkr with all the options chip tricks talking .....is funny for kids and i don´t like the titan software and f**ked up party poker the worst site i had played f**k software and the worst support on the online poker world
Joined: Apr '09
Age: 38 (M)
Posted by Exiles: PKR for sure, but very heavy on the computer.
it's actually not so bad on computer, the one I play on is around 8 years old, graphics card about 5 years old, runs fine (i play low detail, but looks pretty similar to high detail) 3d graphics been around for a long time..
Obv if your comp is aging then you prob want to avoid running multiple apps alongside PKR, but for me a web browser and a PKR is ok
Joined: Nov '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 45 (M)
PKR are gona win this hands down no one else offers that kind of interaction and options when it comes to chosing and decking out your avitor. When i first went there i was so busy playing with the options i missed the fact i had AA and i timed out...lol (Soooooo Sad) FTP is quite good for standard play ability and i would aggre that 888 is the worst for sure. But surly its not just or all about graphics, you need to feel a site to play well there if not why would you keep coming back? Matbe for the fish but if i didnt like the way a site played or looked i'd defo go some where else you have so much choise these days you would be crazy not to Dont you think?
Joined: Mar '09
Age: 46 (M)
Are you lot kidding? PKR isn't that great looking if you break it down. So what, it has semi-3D graphics? The table just looks cluttered and awkward because of it. The only thing I like is that you have to look at your hole cards manually, which can be useful when faking tells and bluffs.
The actual "3D" effect isn't that great, Ladbrokes poker had 3D tables for as long but nobody used them, they stuck to their 2D overhead view, why? because it's not a playstation game! PKR is a bit of a joke tbh. Just my opinion.
Pokerstars is one of the better looking, they have the best range of skins, but I hate it there. Their sound is awful too.
Merge poker have the best sound effects but look very ordinary.
Party have nice looking tables if you use the alternative designs for table and cards. But it's sucky to play on because most of the players are luckster fish.
888 isn't too bad if you don't use avatars, same with any of the iPoker sites. Who isn't sick to death of their usual cowboy, woman in red dress, man in suit ... YAWN. Non manually re-sizeable tables lets iPoker down the most.
Full titl isn't very nice looking either, they always looked behind the times.
I'll say Stars and Party for looks, Merge for sound. Pity they couldn't combine them.
PKR is the worst ? The question is who has the best graphics. Mate, whether you like the site or not, when it comes to graphics, it isn't the worst.
Anyway, I play PKR all the time, only once have i ever turned sound on, prob about 2 months after i started playing there, never even thought to turn the sound on, on any poker software. Why would you.