Only logged-in members can vote!
→ Click here to create a Mob account which gives you access to our forum and all our free bankrolls (no deposit bonuses) → Log in to existing account!
Joined: Oct '09
Location: Lithuania
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 2805
Who of this too bluff harder ? Phil Helmut who can in hand have only a pair of 6-6 till 10-10 and saw flop with A K or Q in but he have only low cards pair and put all in ....... or Tony G only saw hand with A and 1 card lo 2 till 7 but do all in or better in hand 2-2 till 5-5 and no flop in but he push all in ...
Joined: Oct '09
Location: Austria
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 42
I think Tony G's all presence makes him a better bluffer... His al-round talk at the table makes you crazy and people can't think straight so guessing if he is bluffing is much harder than Helmut, plus I dont like Helmut anyway
Joined: Oct '09
Location: Lithuania
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 2805
i dont like Helmut too because his very arogantic and always say iam the best ever player in the world just he win because he very lucky gay i never loose if my opponents dont get very lucky rivereds i think there are no many poker likers who very like Helmut and his is the best player 4 then
Tony G all the way. I can't remember what event he was playing in but he was very obnoxious and was pounding his fists on the table and bashiing his op verbally. But he was throwing some big bluffs in the game which eventually caught up with him tho.
Joined: Jan '09
Location: New Zealand
Age: 36 (M)
Posts: 463
Hellmuth is boring to watch. It only gets interesting if he loses, especially when he gets sucked out on. Hes a pretty tight player but I dislike his personally when he play. Apparently hes totally different away from the tables and interviews..
Joined: Nov '09
Location: United States
Age: 37 (F)
Posts: 38
No one likes Helmut. . . He's a.. frankly, a word I can't say on here! As far as bluffing.. I have to give it to Tony G - He's definetely an artist. I don't like the comparison, Helmut is just a lucky prick...
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Sweden
Age: 56 (M)
Posts: 582
Posted by Doomsday_vic: Hellmuth is boring to watch. It only gets interesting if he loses, especially when he gets sucked out on. Hes a pretty tight player but I dislike his personally when he play. Apparently hes totally different away from the tables and interviews..
Neither of them is a nice guy. I voted for Tony G but not because I think is more aggressive than Helmut but because is more interesting to watch playing. Of course I wouldn't aver play against him
Cant really say im a huge fan of either player, but fact is Hellmuth is a far more accomplished tourney player whereas when he's playing cash he just seems to really suck & always ends up burning cash. I seen Tony G on more bluffs than Hellmuth, so my vote goes to him.
Joined: Oct '09
Location: Lithuania
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 2805
WAUUU i saw that a lot off poker players in internet dont like Helmuth better not very good player but who isnt so arogantic like helmuth did any 1 saw last big tourney with helmuth? i dont see him in final table because his star falling down very fast and i think after 3-5 years nobody speek about helmuth because his die like good poker player
Joined: Feb '09
Location: Belgium
Age: 34 (M)
Posts: 686
I dont like hellmuth and i dont like Tony G xD but, yes, i think that Tony G is more likely to bluff. His game is more chaotic, he like that people look at him and a good way for this is to make some crazy bluffs ^^
Anyway, even if i dont like them, they are some good players
and i think after 3-5 years nobody speek about helmuth because his die like good 
