Only logged-in members can vote!
→ Click here to create a Mob account which gives you access to our forum and all our free bankrolls (no deposit bonuses) → Log in to existing account!
Joined: Feb '08
Location: Ireland
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 638
at the moment i prefer Bigbet as im building the bankroll....like the layout love the smileys and enjoy playing the bounty stt .... other than that it has to be pokerstars .... it has the best range of mtt stt and can easily get a game to play at any time for any buy in ........ and the system they have for separating all the different buy ins eg micro medium large makes it real easy to see whats available in youre price range ........ plus they have a good variety of games so when you want to play something other than holdem you can ... like razz .... i like this game and its nice to play it for a change ...
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
I vote PKR, if I was professional, I wouldn't play there and I'd prob vote stars. But I like to enjoy my sessions and I enjoy playing at PKR more than any other room, simple as that.
Voted for PS because is the one, with FT too, I played on. Also because is the biggest, well organized and offers lots of solutions to play. But if you want to tray to build a career mayeb it's not the ideal one: too many players and too many lucky donkeys
Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 6197
Posted by jessthehuman: I vote PKR, if I was professional, I wouldn't play there and I'd prob vote stars. But I like to enjoy my sessions and I enjoy playing at PKR more than any other room, simple as that.
I kinda think the same, i play kinda very small semi-pro at PKR, when i gonna climb the stakes and play higher i have to leave PKR and move too Stars/Cake ect.
Joined: Sep '09
Location: France
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 301
Party Poker, because i never tried full tilt and pokerstars PKR is a really ugly room in my opinion, and tournaments offered arent very interesting. What i like on party poker is the design and the cool freerolls with at the end a token for bigger freeroll, and the structure of the tourneys. What i dislike on party poker is the structure of the sit n go, much 2 fast in my opinion
PKR - Slow, boring, tedious and full of complete idiots who are dumb enough to think that it looks realistic
Pokerstars - best of a bad bunch. Fields are too big, tournaments take too long, and you very rarely cash for anything more than a few cents above what you bought in for...
Full Tilt - Dont even get me started on this joke of a site. Full of PW thieves and multi accounters. The site has completely gone to s**t lately. Used to be the best site of all, now just a joke
Party Poker - Be serious... how anyone could even contemplate playing on there is beyond me.. Its a complete joke of a site. You cant play in any game at all until you deposit... YEAH RIGHT... If you have money why would you want to play in freerolls.. dumbasses....
So for me its none of the above..
Anything on the Merge Network or Ipoker network, they are the best sites, after that its the smaller sites like some of hte Everleaf skins..
Joined: May '08
Location: Sweden
Age: 55 (M)
Posts: 1362
I voted PKR, because I'm at the moment playing there, clearing a bonus. I like it when the little men and women talk, and such, but I'm not sure for how long I will find it amusing. They seem to have and interesting rewardssystem, though, I have gotten a lot of tournamentstickets, for moving up it, and in the next stage, they say I'm going to get some sort of magazine, as well.
Joined: Feb '08
Location: Belgium
Age: 64 (M)
Posts: 751
i voted poker stars but i like FT as well as party poker ... PKR is not really my thing , guess it's more a poker room for the younger players with all the special graphics ...
I tried PKR last week, made a $30 deposit on the Friday, played for 2 days & absolutely hated it. So many idiots that call with anything & somehow get lucky (or maybe i just ran bad) The gfx nice, but its slow. I prefer Fulltilt, love the software & speed of game, yes there are bad beats there too, but atleast i can multitable 6-8 tables comfortably, so when i do get sucked out on, it doesn't even bother me.... unlike PKR where i wait unduly long to flop a strong hand i.e. full house & get busted by rivered straight flush and i could only do 3 tables max & would still forget my hole cards lol. Also add Bodog on the list! Awesome site for its very low rake!
Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 6197
I am pretty sure in 4/5 years every big pokerroom looks like PKR. They are nr1 on the net when it comes too graphics, not any other room comes even close. You can Hate or Luv PKR, fact is they are nr1 graphics. Its slow that sucks, multi is kinda new too, u must get used too it. Graphics attracks so many donks thats wot we all want isnt it? PKR is biggest growing network for non-usa players.
Btw i am not trying to defend PKR, only say look at the facts, Hate it or Luv it
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Slovenia
Age: 55 (M)
Posts: 124
From those it si Pokerstars. Best site for tournaments for my oppinion. PKR has good design but poor poker function. But I play mopst of time on Mansion.
Joined: May '09
Location: Spain
Age: 49 (M)
Posts: 1331
Hi.
I voted FTP. For the levels I play (NL25, NL50 soon ), its the best site in the net. Great soft, the best promotions for my levels, lots of stupids players that calls my premium with any two..
Joined: Aug '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 79
Mine was Pokerroom had good graphics lobby support and friendly chat room, but then it merged to Bwin prob the worst thing it could of done. Ladbrokes its up there for me too. I mean FT and PS r great if u have a spare 9 hours for a tourney. PKR is good if u want to have a laught but my laptop is weak and can only handle 2 tables there and nothing eles
tour 4 free and can win till 300 
), its the best site in the net. Great soft, the best 
