What percentage you typically lose your initial hand with AA?
Only logged-in members can vote!
→ Click here to create a Mob account which gives you access to our forum and all our free bankrolls (no deposit bonuses) → Log in to existing account!
Joined: Jun '09
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 337
I usually when I have AA my winning percentage whit them is around 80-85%,so I voted for the option number one.....that is just in the statistic of poker tracker.........
Joined: Oct '09
Location: Sweden
Age: 33 (M)
Posts: 114
20%! It's hard though, sitting on high cards, when I raise or go all in people tend to fold. This makes the profit 1,5 BB for a set of cards you get once a day. I hate to call or miniraise pre-flop, since then people always hit higher s**t, like flush or straight.
AA all-in, which gets called pre-flop usually ends up a sweet moneymaker.
Joined: Aug '09
Location: Chile
Age: 37 (M)
Posts: 1353
My aces just got cracked by A2. I raised 7BB (3 limpers), the guy with A2 called, flop came 822 and bye aces.
If you are asking me I think I lose 30% of the time with my pocket aces, but if you asked pokertracker, it said that I lose only 12% when I'm holding pocket aces hhahaha, so I can't believe waht you said about you lose more than 50% of the time with aces. If that is true you shoukd start folding aces man.
bla bla bla lmao 50% you lose with aces, well you have played them wrong, or just swap your cards for 7 2 off suit thats got a better chance of winning....
wow a massive 50% ffs just shoot your self and give up poker
------------ oh and to the donks who lose 80% to aces , well il get my shotgun out now take you to the bottom of the garden and put you out your misery, wtf are you playing poker for if this is happening
Last month I went all-in in pre-flop with AA against a guy who had TT. I lose, but the most funny was that next hand I caught AA again and, again all-in in pre-flop with ... the same guy!! Guess that? AA against QT off. Straight for him. So ... be patient, poker is so unfair ...
Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 6197
Posted by teteban: Anyone voting any option other than 1 is either - lying - exaggerating their losing times - just doesn't have a significant sample size
+1
Losing more then 50% not possible, if more then 50% please stop poker, ur a complete poker noob. But most likely ur just lying.........
Joined: May '08
Location: Sweden
Age: 55 (M)
Posts: 1362
Posted by DaMessiah666: Last month I went all-in in pre-flop with AA against a guy who had TT. I lose, but the most funny was that next hand I caught AA again and, again all-in in pre-flop with ... the same guy!! Guess that? AA against QT off. Straight for him. So ... be patient, poker is so unfair ...
That is just pure ewil.
(I once played two hands in a row against a guy, where he flopped a set of jacks in both hands and of course beat me. I had an overpair in one of them, the other I don't remeber, but it went to showdown. Doesn't feel fair, in some strange kind of way...)
Joined: May '09
Location: India
Age: 37 (M)
Posts: 4873
i agree anyone losing more than 50% times with AA is just exaggerating or has played too few hands. i think it will be more interesting to know what % of the money you bet on AA you win/lose than winning hands as in the end money is the thing tht matters. many times u raise gets uncalled but u lose a significant portion of your buyin when they do get cracked. ( will be difficult to calculate tht retrograde though)
Posted by doomdy: Losing more then 50% not possible, if more then 50% please stop poker, ur a complete poker noob. But most likely ur just lying.........
I don't agree. We are assuming Texas Hold'em No Limit? In Pot Limit, it's a very common situation to crack pocket rockets. Just think in that: with AA and two more players involved in a hand, your percentaje of success will reduce in a simple 50%! In Pot Limit, as a average, there are always more than 3 players playing until showdown.
