Thank god the FBI moved in on these guys, Lets just hope they go all the way and audit the rigged deals we see. As it stands rules allow card manipulation as long as that rigged deal is random E.G. you can rig deals for action. A true test of long number probability should catch these cheats out
Fair comment Jess, Rest assured as we speak I lobby EU and English gaming commissions. The ball is rolling and I am sure these sites will be replaced by an honest deal in the near feature.
Joined: Dec '09
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 2087
lmfao your fingers must be all over the place holding back. On you go jess you can do it give an honest answer no one will ban you we will all be happy and give you
I love poker jovickralj but i hate dealers that cheat the deals and ruin the game. Why should i put up with these sites cheating the deals and turning the game into a pure luck situation just to increase there rake by creating repetitive turn over .
No on line site is tested for expected outcome (long number probability) because they all know they will fail these tests. Open your eyes and join the cause for a real honest deal and a true game of poker.
Joined: Nov '10
Location: Serbia
Age: 37 (M)
Posts: 2087
Posted by onlinejoke: ?? explain
------------ well great reply jess this explains all
You should just admit that you dont know how to play. Jess and I, like lot of other people, have profit on online poker. So Im more lucky then you? Or for you is rigged and for me it is not? Look any TV show (HSP for example) and see how many bad beats there is... That is poker. You can imagine how much bad beats I had but Im still earning money from poker.
Joined: Feb '11
Location: Canada
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 1660
HaHaHaHaHaHaHa, don't they have an independent agency that goes around and tests the random number generators using a huge data sample size to ensure that it is pretty legit (as legit as possible given the engineering restrictions)?
In addition don't they publish all hands after a certain amount of time for independent scrutiny and private citizens have confirmed it as well.
Well that answer sucks flipp. firstly rigged has nothing to do with winning or losing ITS ACTUALLY SOMETHING TO DO WITH PROBABILITY.
I supported myself off live poker for 3 years but travel and family commitment don't mix so I can sure play poker. If on line poker was so honest they would have proper tests in place but as it stands they avoid any testing that would prove site reflects an unbias deal. just do the math and try this?????? heads up 3 in ten hands should be won by a high card thats math and it wont happen on line, Check it out.
------------ Well that answer sucks flipp. firstly rigged has nothing to do with winning or losing ITS ACTUALLY SOMETHING TO DO WITH PROBABILITY.
I supported myself off live poker for 3 years but travel and family commitment don't mix so I can sure play poker. If on line poker was so honest they would have proper tests in place but as it stands they avoid any testing that would prove site reflects an unbias deal. just do the math and try this?????? heads up 3 in ten hands should be won by a high card thats math and it wont happen on line, Check it out.
------------ Some facts ???? 1; Gambling commissions regulations allow deal manipulation as long as that bias has some randomness EG a mug at 8% can be 50% if programming wants this but out come is still random.
2 I have contacted 3 gambling commissions asking them to introduce test of long number probability EG a proper honest equally random selection from the dealer THEY REFUSED
3 These tests that are carried out are done by TESTING HOUSES and none of them test for reflection of a real live non bias deal.
So much for your dependent testing bud
------------ Some facts ???? 1; Gambling commissions regulations allow deal manipulation as long as that bias has some randomness EG a mug at 8% can be 50% if programming wants this but out come is still random.
2 I have contacted 3 gambling commissions asking them to introduce test of long number probability EG a proper honest equally random selection from the dealer THEY REFUSED
3 These tests that are carried out are done by TESTING HOUSES and none of them test for reflection of a real live non bias deal.
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
wow I'm sold man, perhaps the only thing that may have made your post better would be if it was all caps. I HEAR THAT IS A GREAT WAY OF MAKING A POINT ABOUT RIGGED RNGS !!!111ONE11!!!
Joined: Jan '09
Location: Italy
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 3871
Posted by jessthehuman: the only thing that may have made your post better would be if it was all caps. I HEAR THAT IS A GREAT WAY OF MAKING A POINT ABOUT RIGGED RNGS !!!111ONE11!!!
I'd also suggest not to miss to insert lots of every three or four words
Joined: Mar '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 6714
Because thats just what the FBI are doing....the "FBI" OMG Im starting to know how it feels to be Jessthehuman, Im sure the RNGs will be tested by the "FBI" I guess ignorance is bliss. Its like shaun of the dead in here ATM, except we are getting rigtards instead of zombies, just as funny tho.
no one will ban you we will all be happy and give you 
