theres a multi billion dollar industry that does want anything on google so it makes it hard to find. I have data showing my aces winning 86% which appears fine but upon examination must never saw a flop so % is to low. Full hand testing is needed
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
Posted by onlinejoke: jessthehuman says he has proof its not but wont publish any data.
O Rly?
Just to clarify my position: I believe the onus of proof is ALWAYS on the person making the wild claims/allegations. And I don't accept anecdotal evidence as proof. I will only accept empirical data. Luckily for onlinejoke; HH can provide the empirical data he requires. So either put up or shutup.
Just to clarify my position: I believe the onus of proof is ALWAYS on the person making the wild claims/allegations. And I don't accept anecdotal evidence as proof. I will only accept empirical data. Luckily for onlinejoke; HH can provide the empirical data he requires. So either put up or shutup.
More bull and total avoidance of any data just as the entire online poker industry does. You must work or be paid by these guys to keep this propaganda up.
I have given facts and i will repeat some
1 3 in ten hands heads up should be won with a high card after the river , Try it 2 Gaming commissions allow on line poker to manipulate there deals read ther criteria 3 Not one test in the entire industry id done to show there deal reflects an un bias deal to probability.
Your turn Mr mouth print some facts not opinions or statistices that can say anything, FACTS
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
Posted by SuperNoob: second proof that long number probability is the only true test of genuine deal and everything else is biased to a big extent.
This might come back to bite me in the ass, although 5 minutes of "googln" suggests it won't. I would like to see proof that "long number probability" is even a real term.
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
Posted by onlinejoke:\ You must work or be paid by these guys to keep this propaganda up.
I get this a lot - I take it as a compliment.
------------
Posted by onlinejoke: \But jess provides not one shred of evidence in thousands of posts
Evidence for what ? I'm not the one making the wild claims. We're ALL waiting on evidence from you bro.
------------
Posted by onlinejoke 1 3 in ten hands heads up should be won with a high card after the river , Try it 2 Gaming commissions allow on line poker to manipulate there deals read ther criteria 3 Not one test in the entire industry id done to show there deal reflects an un bias deal to probability.
1) A) 10 hands is NOT a suitable sample data to prove anything. B) As I've said in all your threads - I regularly play HU flips on PKR - they have lots of HU lotteries. I promise you high card wins plenty. 2) Citations needed (from you) 3) These sites are certified and their RNG code etc is certified. Once again citations needed (by you).
As I go along the line of believing the certification, etc - "propaganda line" as you would put it of the poker rooms, it is not my duty to provide evidence that the accepted truth is incorrect. If you want to tell me man didn't walk on the moon - I don't have to prove they did - you have to prove they didn't. You want to tell me God exists - I don't have to prove he doesn't.
Joined: Dec '09 Location: United Kingdom Age: 29 (M) Posts: 1417 lol i like how hes on your case jess when he wont show you any when its him with the problem ahaha all his proof is in the word FACT bla bla bla bla
I have published some facts yet jess shows none and again I will say why does an entire industry fail to publish any test results to prove deals are straight this would add credibility but no they all avoid proper testing.
Here is some proof of the false certification even jess can understand. Check out the link and explain how they certify a 97.5% pay out in poker at poker time.
If the deals were unbiased to probability why would sites need to use false certification like this
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
You need to understand 'joke, you're basically asking me to go out of my way, do a tonne of research and work to prove or disprove your theory. I don't believe your theories, I have no vested interest in investigating them for you. Do you understand this yet ?
You need to clear your eyes a little.. I'm not having some debate with you, I am simply telling you I don't believe your conspiracy theory.
------------
Posted by onlinejoke: Check out the link and explain how they certify a 97.5% pay out in poker at poker time.
What do you mean 10 hands is not enough, Monitor 100 or 1000 or 10,000 then and check out this fraudulent certification for poker time.97.5% pay out lol isnt rake 5% and heads up thats 10% of your profit http://www.ecogra.org/certificates/certificate.aspx?cid=7
now print you data or offer one grain of fact to support that never ending bull shittt you post.
------------ What do you mean 10 hands is not enough, Monitor 100 or 1000 or 10,000 then and check out this fraudulent certification for poker time.97.5% pay out lol isnt rake 5% and heads up thats 10% of your profit http://www.ecogra.org/certificates/certificate.aspx?cid=7
now print you data or offer one grain of fact to support that never ending bull shittt you post.
Joined: Sep '09 Location: United Kingdom Age: 31 (M) Posts: 3860 jess have even proof that they are aliens but the goverment are covering it up, the truth is out there.....................
was that age 31 or 13, It sounds like the reply of a 13 year old to me. I have published hard proof unlike that for alian life form though jess might qualify????
