Joined: May '14
Location: India
Age: 30 (M)
Posts: 5
I really like playing in the BankrollMob freeroll but the only problem is that there is no maximum number limit. This way the gameplay becomes very donkey-ish and no proper poker is played. Am I the only one who would love to see a limit on number of people that can join so that it can be more fun? I remember when pokerowned's freeroll had maximum of 90 and only $10 cash prize. even they've removed maximum limit now. Not asking brm to put 90 max limit but even 1000 or 1500 is a good limit. Just my opinion please dont hate.
Joined: Feb '08
Location: Denmark
Age: 59 (M)
Posts: 4
Posted by Chipsteal_JJ: I really like playing in the BankrollMob freeroll but the only problem is that there is no maximum number limit. This way the gameplay becomes very donkey-ish and no proper poker is played. Am I the only one who would love to see a limit on number of people that can join so that it can be more fun? I remember when pokerowned's freeroll had maximum of 90 and only $10 cash prize. even they've removed maximum limit now. Not asking brm to put 90 max limit but even 1000 or 1500 is a good limit. Just my opinion please dont hate.
Joined: Jun '13
Location: Netherlands
Age: 45 (M)
Posts: 257
Posted by Chipsteal_JJ: I really like playing in the BankrollMob freeroll but the only problem is that there is no maximum number limit. This way the gameplay becomes very donkey-ish and no proper poker is played. Am I the only one who would love to see a limit on number of people that can join so that it can be more fun? I remember when pokerowned's freeroll had maximum of 90 and only $10 cash prize. even they've removed maximum limit now. Not asking brm to put 90 max limit but even 1000 or 1500 is a good limit. Just my opinion please dont hate.
i dont think it will work ,all in morons still there or 4/9 donks how you will call it its a idea , mabye is it an option to delete the late registration ??? than the real wanna players can come in 15 min. for me is 500 players enough
Joined: Nov '11
Location: Croatia
Age: 46 (M)
Posts: 426
350 entrants are be enough. I really enjoy when we have these tournaments on PP and 8 8 8.We play really great PoKEr.Now on PS and FT is really stupid even try to do something with all this parasites.I dont want blame PoKeR sites or BRM for this situation,but they can do something about that.
Joined: Aug '14
Location: Germany
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 766
I am totally supporting your idea, but somehow it needed to be assured that only real mobsters are getting the places and not russian password stealers. If it is capped the mobsters needed to get the password quick, so that it is already nearly full before the password is on the web.
Posted by Chipsteal_JJ: I really like playing in the BankrollMob freeroll but the only problem is that there is no maximum number limit. This way the gameplay becomes very donkey-ish and no proper poker is played. Am I the only one who would love to see a limit on number of people that can join so that it can be more fun? I remember when pokerowned's freeroll had maximum of 90 and only $10 cash prize. even they've removed maximum limit now. Not asking brm to put 90 max limit but even 1000 or 1500 is a good limit. Just my opinion please dont hate.
The free rolls on poker owned only allow 1 minute too register with no late registration and password still gets leaked people are too lazy too earn points on that site but agree max should be 1000 entrants 117 places paid no late registration too prevent the infestation of the multiple account cheats
Joined: May '08
Location: Lithuania
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 10090
whats the point of putting a limit on number of entrants if you cant control who enter... does it matter if you have max 1500 players if 1499 of them are donks, or max 100 players if 99 of them are donks? obviously game quality could change only and only if real mobbits would allowed to play and not some random dudes who have password.
Joined: Dec '14
Location: Canada
Age: 56 (M)
Posts: 104
Posted by raymonvdhaak:
Posted by Chipsteal_JJ: I really like playing in the BankrollMob freeroll but the only problem is that there is no maximum number limit. This way the gameplay becomes very donkey-ish and no proper poker is played. Am I the only one who would love to see a limit on number of people that can join so that it can be more fun? I remember when pokerowned's freeroll had maximum of 90 and only $10 cash prize. even they've removed maximum limit now. Not asking brm to put 90 max limit but even 1000 or 1500 is a good limit. Just my opinion please dont hate.
i dont think it will work ,all in morons still there or 4/9 donks how you will call it its a idea , mabye is it an option to delete the late registration ??? than the real wanna players can come in 15 min. for me is 500 players enough
------------ I like the idea of the getting rid of the late registration. I don't think limiting the amount of registrants would make a difference at all. Good luck fellow Mobsters.
Edited by GtodaM001 (14 February 2015 @ 00:30 GMT)
Joined: Aug '14
Location: Germany
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 766
Posted by GtodaM001:
Posted by raymonvdhaak:
Posted by Chipsteal_JJ: I really like playing in the BankrollMob freeroll but the only problem is that there is no maximum number limit. This way the gameplay becomes very donkey-ish and no proper poker is played. Am I the only one who would love to see a limit on number of people that can join so that it can be more fun? I remember when pokerowned's freeroll had maximum of 90 and only $10 cash prize. even they've removed maximum limit now. Not asking brm to put 90 max limit but even 1000 or 1500 is a good limit. Just my opinion please dont hate.
i dont think it will work ,all in morons still there or 4/9 donks how you will call it its a idea , mabye is it an option to delete the late registration ??? than the real wanna players can come in 15 min. for me is 500 players enough
------------ I like the idea of the getting rid of the late registration. I don't think limiting the amount of registrants would make a difference at all. Good luck fellow Mobsters.
It possibly make a difference as I tried to explain earlier. So let me try this again: It usually takes up to 2-3 minutes until the passord is known to everyone. If lets say 500 mob members go to the brm site and can register before that and only 500 are allowed, no one else will be able to play.
Joined: Jun '13
Location: Canada
Age: 81 (M)
Posts: 3700
Posted by pochui: whats the point of putting a limit on number of entrants if you cant control who enter... does it matter if you have max 1500 players if 1499 of them are donks, or max 100 players if 99 of them are donks? obviously game quality could change only and only if real mobbits would allowed to play and not some random dudes who have password.
Even if it was restricted to mobbers i know there would be a change with a little bit less donks. But you have to realyse the some mobbers can be donkeys and i really know what i am talking about.
With a little competition over registering on time, BRM would maybe convert some more of the thieves into registered members. The downside would be regular members complaining of not getting in.
Also the server would get thousands of page requests all at once at the time of password release, there may be a need of a proper caching strategy, so that the site is able to deal with it.
The thieves could easily adapt, by simply scripting the password retrieval, making it available within a few seconds after release.
