Joined: Feb '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 47 (M)
Posts: 73
sorry but I have to agree with my belgium and dutch friends ... VERY bad play here. If you think this is a good play you are thinking results oriented. I think 9 out of 10 times your opponent is holding a strong hand here that he will NOT fold to ANY bet.
you should rarely bluff when out of position anyway ... such a dangerous way to play !
the hand reminds me of a mike matesow blow up lmao
Not a good play, as for me This time you were luchy to find a donkey bigger than me and I suggest you yo note his name to play aginst him again, but next time you couldn't be so lucky
This was a very very bad bluff and totally unncecessary. It might have worked this time but you just risked your whole stack on a wreckless bluff out of position and 2 ppl behind you showing strength.
call before the flop is ok, bet on the flop is not really a good move but can be justified, call of the re-raise on the flop is ok because u have implied odds, but even then one of your 2 outs might make someone else's flush. But as soon as u missed on the turn you should have been out of the hand.
That being said, the guy with the queens is also a horribe horrible player. He probably made a mistake on every street, and especially on the river by raising that small bet. Why would you ever raised on the river when the board was paired? All I can think of was he might have put you on a K or something and tried to bluff you out of it.
So it was a bluff vs. bluff situation of one bad player vs. another bad player.
and why was button worried about kickers or KK?? he had aces full of fives, even if u had A-K its still a split pot and it would beat kings full too. That doesn't even make any sense....
Joined: Jan '08
Location: Canada
Age: 36 (M)
Posts: 2698
I don't think I'll ever find myself in this situation..River is a good card to bluff as long as no one else has an ace. Why is the guy with QQ raising that river with that pot, greedy guy.
