Joined: Aug '08
Location: Poland
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 804
I came up with an idea. What do you think about Sunday raffle prizes being $10 instead of $50. So that in a month instead of 4-6 winners there would be 20-30... Smaller winnings, but more people would win and it would be more interesting and better in my opinion. What do you think?
Joined: Jan '14
Location: Romania
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 13310
it's a very good idea, where sometimes there can be 5 winners, sometimes 10 or more. This can be done, but you have to talk to the administrators, and they to accept this good idea. Good luck with that.
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Poland
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 804
5thirthy7 With a prize of $50, you may never win. And with a prize of $10, you can win a few times, and collect the rest for withdrawal without any problems. So I think a smaller prize and more winners would be better. Let more people speak. And what do the administrators think about this idea...?
Joined: Feb '23
Location: Poland
Age: 40 (F)
Posts: 284
I think smaller prizes with more people won is a very good idea. Everyone then has a better chance of winning something, and it's so hard to win if only one or two people are drawn for a prize. Statistically, the smaller the prizes, the greater the chance of winning. I think this idea should be implemented as soon as possible. Basically, 5/10 users could then win every week.
Joined: May '09
Location: Croatia
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 20476
not a good idea and they will not change anything! they only do thing when they want, then dont listen to members! what do you have from 10 $? what you can earn, spend or anything with 10 $? come on people be normal and realistic, its not charity organisation and that they need to give 5 or 10 $! and when prize is 50 $, then some member can make cashout right away, not need to collect for months more points, especially when somebody isnt active on forum or other things!
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Poland
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 804
This is what will force people to be more active. And I think it's all about having as many people registered as possible, so that as many as possible contribute to the forum, etc. And you dule -vu as an active member won for 14 years, congratulations once again. What a charity institution ... after all, bankrollmob earns thanks to users, and the sum of prizes will not change if there are more smaller prizes.
Joined: May '09
Location: Croatia
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 20476
yeah, charity organisation that need to give prize of 10 $, come on be serious! you can force people to be more active, they will still not write on forum, they will not try to earn points, because they dont like to write or dont have anything to say! its sill to have small prize, winners take it all and if we collect 10000 tickets, then we will have two prizes! its same with jackpots on slots, you want to take bigger amount, not some small!
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Poland
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 804
Well, I just don't want to and never play jackpot slot machines. Because to me it is a scam that many people have to win a lot less on a slot compared to other slots for one person to win a huge amount. With the lottery prize reduced to $10, one person can win the lottery several times a year. And I guess it's all about bankrollmob users being active, not dead accounts.
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Poland
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 804
And in tournament poker, you're all for big wins for the winner. Is there a smaller win, and that the prize pool is spread more flat ..? Because I personally think that it would be better if the distribution of prizes in poker tournaments was more fair and evenly distributed for individual places. Because these are just catchphrases someone won a jackpot, someone won the lotto, someone won a mega win in a tournament for 1st place.
