Joined: May '08
Location: Germany
Age: 61 (M)
Posts: 6787
You should come up with a propper hand history. He can't check to you, if you are the small blind. A bit of history between the players wouldn't hurt too.
Joined: May '08
Location: Germany
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 1118
Posted by shokaku: You should come up with a propper hand history. He can't check to you, if you are the small blind. A bit of history between the players wouldn't hurt too.
Joined: Oct '08
Location: Germany
Age: 51 (M)
Posts: 2025
indeed not much info about player x. he could have anything, but he clearly hasnt aces/kings else he would have reraise you again or shove. i put him on AK and you JJ. if someone holds the kings then you, and he probably jays as umarplus says. but since we dont know player x...he could also be a maniac with pocket XX who still keep calling even tho thers 2 overcards on flop.
Joined: Nov '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49 (M)
Posts: 2194
Posted by shokaku:
Posted by umarplus: also the cards have no suits.
Maybe because the suits don't matter in the hand.
Posted by umarplus: it might be JJ vs KK too...
Oh. Setup. I guess AK or AA vs K8 or K3 is more likely.
SUITS DONT MATTER NO FLUSH DRAWS
------------
Posted by T3ddyKGB: indeed not much info about player x. he could have anything, but he clearly hasnt aces/kings else he would have reraise you again or shove. i put him on AK and you JJ. if someone holds the kings then you, and he probably jays as umarplus says. but since we dont know player x...he could also be a maniac with pocket XX who still keep calling even tho thers 2 overcards on flop.
I like your thinking but its still a bit mixed up..lol
------------
Posted by umarplus: i guess that you had AK and your opponent was playing pocket 3s or some sort of jack; AJ maybe.
Close but not quite..hehehe
------------ I'llpost the answer at 10:30ish
------------ Well a few good ones there but no correct answers I'm afraid. I had QQ and Player X had AJ……………. What I hear you say ….. I know I know I know How and why it went like that I'm not sure…. I can only presume he thought I would not bet trips so betting to him was a bluff? I presumed he would raise me if he had the K (trips) Maybe he thought I had like QJ or 10J and he could out kick me? I was suspicious he might have been holding AA when the cards come over I was shocked to say the least.
I'm ready for you all to tell me how wrong I was now…..hahaha
Edited by xxxbchxxx (20 December 2009 @ 10:31 GMT)
