How many posts should a user have before you think he's trustworthy?
Only logged-in members can vote!
→ Click here to create a Mob account which gives you access to our forum and all our free bankrolls (no deposit bonuses) → Log in to existing account!
Joined: Aug '07
Location: Malta
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 8351
R3D, Well, no automatic-action will be taken. It won't be like "now you've posted too much, so you can not post any more". It will still be possible to post and it will still be possible to receive points. It's simply a reminder to keep it serious.
Joined: Feb '08
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 142
ok i have understand it but can u not do against that something what i mean from the 20 post make 25 post that will be better then we can accept it still i can accept it.. i think u make your think good..becouse u are in testing with the bankrollmob poker..that is a good idea to play in points i hope it comes soon
Joined: Jan '08
Location: Croatia
Age: 49 (M)
Posts: 1308
I think theres no amount of points that should be making someone trustworthy and others not. If someone makes 19 posts a day for 11 days hell pass the trustworthy test and start posting just to catch points. Only way to stop this is by going through all the posts that someone had made and read/evaluate them. Everything can be abused if theres a interest in it. Making the value 900 only makes it difficult but not unreachable. I have voted dont know, but if I had to choose it would be 200. Maybe some limit by authorization level should be better solution. Havent read cashout rules yet, i will when it comes to that. IDEA. member status we discussed in some other thread that some members should get VIP status, they could do voting on members or just proposing members which should be reviewed by admins. Just an idea.
Joined: Feb '08
Location: Ireland
Age: 38 (M)
Posts: 136
Just to agree with some of the other posters and maybe add a little...
This system is helpful as I would assume a lot of new posters spam to try get points. I assume trustworthy to mean whether said poster is a spammer. However many posters with lots of posts here post some absolute nonsense. To quantify the "truth" of a poster by the number of posts therefore is a little odd.
However, this system would be effective for reducing spam, of which there is a ridiculous amount here. I would even suggest reducing the critical value to 15 and having the number of posts that th poster has made at 500. People with lots of posts are more likely to have spammed. DUCY?
Joined: Oct '07
Location: Philippines
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 1443
Just an idea, maybe you can get someone (from the users / volunteers ) to check specific threads, then if they see something suspicious (spam / not related / etc) then they give a "buzz" so you can evaluate and remove the points (not the posts). this will save you guys (admin) a lot of time scanning all the threads.
