Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 55 (M)
Posts: 6197
Those handhistorys are a littl bit difficult to read imo, i dont like that software. But you know allready the answer i guess, both hands are played correct imo
Don't see anything wrong with them, maybe raised the second hand to 3X blinds instead of 2X. In both hands you flop the nuts and you won good pots with them. so congrats.
don't really believe these hands were posted to get advise just a little bragging about your winnings
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Portugal
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 36
Posted by weakminded: Don't see anything wrong with them, maybe raised the second hand to 3X blinds instead of 2X. In both hands you flop the nuts and you won good pots with them. so congrats.
don't really believe these hands were posted to get advise just a little bragging about your winnings
No, not at all.
I'm a starter on this poker world and i would like to know if i played well because on the first hand i had two re-raises/all in after my bet and KK don't look so solid after that.
And on the second hand i had QQ on the board that could be dangerous for Full House.
That's why i'm asking if the experts would play these hands like this or would be more conservative.
Joined: Jun '09
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 61 (M)
Posts: 53
Its great that lady luck was flying with you, as many will testify all to often we believe we have the nuts with st8/trips/flush only for the riverto sink us by giving someone the house. congrats on win,
Joined: May '08
Location: Germany
Age: 61 (M)
Posts: 6787
Posted by bfcf: So you would bet less? To do slow play? I'm not a big fan of slow play...
Not slowplay. But we bet nearly 4 in a pot of 2. Opponent must have a VERY strong hand to call that. Maybe try to get the money in over the remaining two streets.
just a little bragging about your winnings 
