Which game do you like more? no limit holdem? Omaha Hi-Lo?
Only logged-in members can vote!
→ Click here to create a Mob account which gives you access to our forum and all our free bankrolls (no deposit bonuses) → Log in to existing account!
Joined: Sep '09
Location: France
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 301
Well i voted for no limit hold'em because i dont know anything about omaha hi-lo (you didnt precise the limit for omaha :o), but i think i would like omaha a lot if i knew it ^^
without hesitation I voted no limit hold'em but if you asked me which one to choose to play on cash game tables online then I go for omaha... why? Less boring.
Joined: Feb '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 1886
Another poll where the answer was instantly obvious and the time limit just annoying. I'm not that practiced at omaha anyway but I hate hi-lo games. I really don't get playing for split pots and the idea of Lo hands in general is stupid to me. So I've never got into hi-lo games or Razz and I don't think I ever will as it will take too long to get used to the value of hands and it seems like a lot of hard work to learn when I get plenty of joy from hold em.
Omaha is not popular as hold'em and I don't see around in any poker room lot of players. Sure, it's a nice game and I tried it but I keep on preferring hold'em.
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Portugal
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 4827
no limit hold em for sure. Omahe lets you think more and count the cards easier, but when having the chance of playing up and down, things get harder, like if you were playing 2 types of game at the same time.
Joined: Nov '09
Location: Poland
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 1189
I really don't like Omaga Hi/lo tried to learn ... tried to play.... but it's not for me ^^. And sharing pots it's rlly annoying... when i win i want all ofc
omaha 
