Only logged-in members can vote!
→ Click here to create a Mob account which gives you access to our forum and all our free bankrolls (no deposit bonuses) → Log in to existing account!
I like to know who do you think has the best poker pros. Is it Full Tilt (my favorites, Phil Ivey, Gus Hansen, Patrik Antonius, Tom Dwan, Erik Seidel, Huck Seed) or Pokerstars (Daniel Negreanu, Joe Hachem, Chris Moneymaker, Jason Mercier, Joe Cada and a lot of Dutch people)
Joined: Feb '11
Location: Canada
Age: 57 (M)
Posts: 753
Yeah, same goes here. Poker Stars pro's will never bother to play a low buyin tourney. FTP pro's do this to give away Tshirts. Also FTP offers chat with their pro's, PS's offers nothing. Althought both stes do have some very fantastic poker players. FTP has the best ones, that's because of their point system. Can you see PS's giving out 2x points to everyone? I sure can't. I mean they don't even offer freerolls anymore. You have to win a ticket to the freeroll, screw that BS. In general, PS's sucks. FTP is the best poker site on the net.
Joined: May '08
Location: Germany
Age: 59 (M)
Posts: 6787
As usual: Full Tilt for cash games and Poker Stars for tourneys. Dwan and Antonius still have to win big tourneys, while Stars is busy adding every good tourney player they can buy to their team.
Joined: Jan '11
Location: United States
Age: 60 (M)
Posts: 3361
Like Ivey and Ferguson at FT, but hate to compare. I like to watch them all and sometimes go with the underdog based on what's happening at the table or tables. Good Luck to All!
Joined: Dec '09
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 2087
fulltilt has prob the biggest names but stars has all the good young players who dont have such a big name. At stars you get lots of bonus money with the points and they also have poker leagues for play chips you can get decent money from if your skint. as shokaku says tilt is good for cash but pretty crap for tourneys but stars is still good for cash to there is always plenty games you are never stuck for one
Joined: Apr '08
Location: Finland
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 1613
Posted by Flippedchips: fulltilt has prob the biggest names but stars has all the good young players who dont have such a big name. At stars you get lots of bonus money with the points and they also have poker leagues for play chips you can get decent money from if your skint. as shokaku says tilt is good for cash but pretty crap for tourneys but stars is still good for cash to there is always plenty games you are never stuck for one
Joined: Dec '09
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 2087
Posted by Davoodoo:
Posted by Flippedchips: fulltilt has prob the biggest names but stars has all the good young players who dont have such a big name. At stars you get lots of bonus money with the points and they also have poker leagues for play chips you can get decent money from if your skint. as shokaku says tilt is good for cash but pretty crap for tourneys but stars is still good for cash to there is always plenty games you are never stuck for one
Joined: Aug '09
Location: Canada
Age: 52 (M)
Posts: 147
fulltilt is much bigger than pokerstars,pokerstars is a joke they are the biggest on line and they are the worst site for not offering no kind of good bonus,like the much smaller sites they offer players free money just to play at there site,,i dont get it
Joined: Jan '11
Location: United States
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 852
Full TIlt Baby all the way!! I never took internet poker seriouslly being a predominately live player, until I starte watching Tom Dwan play, and heard his story! I'll always be a Tilter!!
Joined: Oct '09
Location: Lithuania
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 2805
i think ft has becouse they havent so many pros players us pokerstars but they winig huge money pots online and about 50 % off them belongs to ft pro poker team good luck and have fun
