Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
nice one man ! Gonna have a read now, I'll give my thoughts afterwards. I only replied now- just to say to admin - and anyone else- The only links (poker) I could find on the site were back to BRM
------------ OK - it's a good read, but you need to proof read it - there's some typos and such in there, makes it pretty unprofessional. Also - there is other links too I've noticed now, so you can't advertise your URL on BRM unfortunately
Edited by jessthehuman (19 April 2011 @ 13:31 GMT)
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Portugal
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 4827
You have posted nice stuff on your blog. And some nice hands you have played too. Some of them looks not very well played by the way. We cant see the history of the hand, just the final result, but you show two hands in particular that got me "huh? Does this guy knows what he's doin'?". In the first, you showed you won with a low pair in the hand against someone who has two pairs, and you won because you had straight. But didn't you thought the other player could have flush, since there are four diamonds at the table and you dont have none in your hand? Second, you show you winning with KJ with a flush, ace at flop, beating another guy with ace in the hand. And you are both all in. When was the all in? You have flush of diamonds, but you only have the flush at the river, so it seems like another lucky shot for you and bad beat for the guy you won at, what are you pretending to show with this hands? That you play well? Next time its better if you show hand history, so that blog readers can understand images, if not, perhaps i can be having a really bad image of you right now that its not equal to reality (or is it?).
Joined: Apr '11
Location: United States
Age: 34 (M)
Posts: 81
Posted by Fakiry: You have posted nice stuff on your blog. And some nice hands you have played too. Some of them looks not very well played by the way. We cant see the history of the hand, just the final result, but you show two hands in particular that got me "huh? Does this guy knows what he's doin'?". In the first, you showed you won with a low pair in the hand against someone who has two pairs, and you won because you had straight. But didn't you thought the other player could have flush, since there are four diamonds at the table and you dont have none in your hand? Second, you show you winning with KJ with a flush, ace at flop, beating another guy with ace in the hand. And you are both all in. When was the all in? You have flush of diamonds, but you only have the flush at the river, so it seems like another lucky shot for you and bad beat for the guy you won at, what are you pretending to show with this hands? That you play well? Next time its better if you show hand history, so that blog readers can understand images, if not, perhaps i can be having a really bad image of you right now that its not equal to reality (or is it?).
ok...
Perhaps I should post the others in order...? Didn't quite think of it when I put them up =/
I am a beginner poker player though...but I feel im...ahem...decent...
------------ Ok, how do you work the hand history thing?
I have them saved, but for some reason they are all Notepad file types
------------ Fixed the problem Fakiry, I now have full embeded flash players, showing how lucky I really was. Sorry for the confusing.
Hope you don't think less of me for being some lucky.
------------ confusion* and so* lucky...
couldn't let that go, I haven't gone to sleep yet.
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
nice one Obviously I'm not admin - but my understanding is - any link is fine so long as there's no competition poker advertising.. So hopefully admin lets your blog stay
Joined: Apr '11
Location: United States
Age: 34 (M)
Posts: 81
Wanted to give my blog site a little bump on here. I have quite a few posts and I really try to keep up to date as best I can with it. Thanks for looking guys
