Joined: Nov '09
Location: Canada
Age: 55 (M)
Posts: 2387
Posted by arsenej1: u REALLY brought this thread back up lol? shouldnt a guy ur age be thinking more about retirement and less about fiction? i have learned alot from u tho i must admit! i know use "long number probability" while taking a poop to figure what percentage of body weight i am losing everytime. i only had a small sample of about 80 poops to work with, and rum bum kinda threw off my results abit but i came to the conclusion that a decent poop is about 0.86666 of my body weight.
Posted by jessthehuman: I'm not one of your rigard mates. I'm not interested as I've already tracked my own and none of the s**t you're talking about seems apparent to me.
However - given how many rigtards there are out there, on this forum alone even - I'm sure if you all track your HH and pool it together you'll have plenty. And as I've said already - stars will even email you all of your HH from day 1 print your win rate for your aces when called heads up
so do it already
------------
Posted by onlinejoke: \Great post HH for all your pocket ace hands and we can study the facts
btw my pocket AA holds up almost all the time. I never understand how you idiots always say you lose AA - you must be doing it wrong. Seriously.
well how many weeks on and this pr ick jess still not posted his pocket aa win rate??????????
hahahahah, you really are a fing joke. Have you actually read any of Jess's recent posts - no, thought not
Still no stats and im talking proper stats pre flop, flop, turn and river.
Have you read any of this on here
------------
Posted by mahdrof:
Posted by arsenej1: u REALLY brought this thread back up lol? shouldnt a guy ur age be thinking more about retirement and less about fiction? i have learned alot from u tho i must admit! i know use "long number probability" while taking a poop to figure what percentage of body weight i am losing everytime. i only had a small sample of about 80 poops to work with, and rum bum kinda threw off my results abit but i came to the conclusion that a decent poop is about 0.86666 of my body weight.
LMFAO!
Well thats talking sh it for sure like most online poker fools
Joined: Oct '10
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 63 (M)
Posts: 442
Posted by onlinejoke:
Posted by jbrooksie:
Posted by onlinejoke:
Posted by onlinejoke:
Posted by jessthehuman: I'm not one of your rigard mates. I'm not interested as I've already tracked my own and none of the s**t you're talking about seems apparent to me.
However - given how many rigtards there are out there, on this forum alone even - I'm sure if you all track your HH and pool it together you'll have plenty. And as I've said already - stars will even email you all of your HH from day 1 print your win rate for your aces when called heads up
so do it already
------------
Posted by onlinejoke: \Great post HH for all your pocket ace hands and we can study the facts
btw my pocket AA holds up almost all the time. I never understand how you idiots always say you lose AA - you must be doing it wrong. Seriously.
well how many weeks on and this pr ick jess still not posted his pocket aa win rate??????????
hahahahah, you really are a fing joke. Have you actually read any of Jess's recent posts - no, thought not
Still no stats and im talking proper stats pre flop, flop, turn and river.
Have you read any of this on here
------------
Posted by mahdrof:
Posted by arsenej1: u REALLY brought this thread back up lol? shouldnt a guy ur age be thinking more about retirement and less about fiction? i have learned alot from u tho i must admit! i know use "long number probability" while taking a poop to figure what percentage of body weight i am losing everytime. i only had a small sample of about 80 poops to work with, and rum bum kinda threw off my results abit but i came to the conclusion that a decent poop is about 0.86666 of my body weight.
LMFAO!
Well thats talking sh it for sure like most online poker fools
I will no longer respond to any of your posts, I can't be arsed - you are a cretin.
Joined: Mar '09
Location: Canada
Age: 36 (M)
Posts: 3207
i was talking POOP..u arnt curious to what happends to your body after a nice creamy poop? when i was young i always thought my weight would not change after a streamy wet poop!. after "long number probability" i am now convinced.
Joined: May '11
Location: Canada
Age: 34 (M)
Posts: 979
FACT -this was a long ass answer that should cease your doubts.
Posted by awood88: As much as I hate arguing about this again and again and again...
Posted by onlinejoke: Fact on line gaming commissions allow deal manipulation
If this is a fact please prove it cos I just looked at the UK gambling commission website, which is a government site and it clearly states that in order to obtain an online gaming license, you must follow the codes of practice under section 24 of the Gambling Act 2005 ensuring that gambling is conducted in a fair and open way.
Posted by onlinejoke: Fact poker sites fail to obtain tests of long number probability the only true test of genuine deal
But they have proven that they have the use of genuine RNG, which have been independently tested and found to be fair. This does not confirm 100% that the entire process is fair but even a huge sample of data from collected hands couldn't do this.
Posted by onlinejoke: Fact online poker site testing houses carry out no tests to compare with a genuine unbias deal
Fact there is not one shred of evidence to prove an online deal reflects a genuine live deal
But why should a genuine live deal be better than an online deal. No one has ever collected any evidence to prove that live dealing is completely unbiased or that all hands play out exactly the same number of times. (it would be bizarre if it did) And of course you can't compare live and online deals cos online players play more hands, play is faster, looser and the number of hands going to showdown is bound to differ.
So you have no facts that make any valid point. And I have no invested interest in online poker. I am not an affiliate or investor. I play for my own enjoyment and am happy to continue playing even if it's -ev in the long run. But I am happy to read genuine arguments about why poker is rigged if anyone can ever provide sensible information. Which no one can. So please please PLEASE everyone stop filling my favourite forum with b******t.
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
Posted by onlinejoke:
Posted by onlinejoke:
Posted by jessthehuman: I'm not one of your rigard mates. I'm not interested as I've already tracked my own and none of the s**t you're talking about seems apparent to me.
However - given how many rigtards there are out there, on this forum alone even - I'm sure if you all track your HH and pool it together you'll have plenty. And as I've said already - stars will even email you all of your HH from day 1 print your win rate for your aces when called heads up
so do it already
------------
Posted by onlinejoke: Great post HH for all your pocket ace hands and we can study the facts
btw my pocket AA holds up almost all the time. I never understand how you idiots always say you lose AA - you must be doing it wrong. Seriously.
well how many weeks on and this pr ick jess still not posted his pocket aa win rate??????????
I am fairly sure if you read my post it says "I'm not one of your rigard mates. I'm not interested as I've already tracked my own and none of the s**t you're talking about seems apparent to me."
and "I'm sure if you all track your HH and pool it together you'll have plenty. And as I've said already - stars will even email you all of your HH from day 1 "
I have no interest in doing the research for you. You completely fucking insane; regardless of any evidence I could present to you, you would no doubt either ignore it, mis-understand it or come up with a new insane theory. Why on earth would I waste my time.
Why do I get the impression (sine you show up every few weeks) that you have an account at many poker forums and you just do the rounds posting this crap, in a cycle. It is funny because you rigtards always cry "Shill!" and yet you're the one who posts with no other interest than this dribble. I am fairly sure on OUR forum you do not have a single non-rigged related post.
------------ I also said this.
Posted by jessthehuman:
Posted by onlinejoke: still waiting for that hand history posting jess
You'll be waiting forever. The onus on proof lies solely on the person making the ridiculous claims.
------------ You'll be waiting forever.
I hope this is clear now.
Edited by jessthehuman (11 August 2011 @ 01:19 GMT)
Posted by jessthehuman: I'm not one of your rigard mates. I'm not interested as I've already tracked my own and none of the s**t you're talking about seems apparent to me.
However - given how many rigtards there are out there, on this forum alone even - I'm sure if you all track your HH and pool it together you'll have plenty. And as I've said already - stars will even email you all of your HH from day 1 print your win rate for your aces when called heads up
so do it already
------------
Posted by onlinejoke: Great post HH for all your pocket ace hands and we can study the facts
btw my pocket AA holds up almost all the time. I never understand how you idiots always say you lose AA - you must be doing it wrong. Seriously.
well how many weeks on and this pr ick jess still not posted his pocket aa win rate??????????
I am fairly sure if you read my post it says "I'm not one of your rigard mates. I'm not interested as I've already tracked my own and none of the s**t you're talking about seems apparent to me."
and "I'm sure if you all track your HH and pool it together you'll have plenty. And as I've said already - stars will even email you all of your HH from day 1 "
I have no interest in doing the research for you. You completely fucking insane; regardless of any evidence I could present to you, you would no doubt either ignore it, mis-understand it or come up with a new insane theory. Why on earth would I waste my time.
Why do I get the impression (sine you show up every few weeks) that you have an account at many poker forums and you just do the rounds posting this crap, in a cycle. It is funny because you rigtards always cry "Shill!" and yet you're the one who posts with no other interest than this dribble. I am fairly sure on OUR forum you do not have a single non-rigged related post.
------------ I also said this.
Posted by jessthehuman:
Posted by onlinejoke: still waiting for that hand history posting jess
You'll be waiting forever. The onus on proof lies solely on the person making the ridiculous claims.
------------ You'll be waiting forever.
I hope this is clear now.
You stupid thick fking wanker You stated your fking hands reflected true odds well fking publish and we can conclude this thread you fking moron.
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
Throughout the entire thread I have been telling you I am not going to do that. I am not the one with the interest in it. I have no problems with my sites RNG, I make a nice profit and I don't notice anything unusual, so why would I bother?
You're the crazy one, test your own dumb theories, as if I would waste my time.
------------ I also no longer use HEM. But when I did, it all looked fine, as I already mentioned, my sample size wasn't large enough at the time to be conclusive anyway, I am merely saying, for the sample I had, there was nothing strange.
There is no way I am installing HEM again just to satisfy your dumb ass. Especially since, even if I did publish my results, what would you say ? Would you believe them ?
Of course not, or you would but then come up with another insane theory as to why the site is still rigged anyway.
You're just batshit insane mate, seriously, you need help. I'm not going to do your crazy-persons research for you. The only reason I am evening answering your thread is that I find your insane ramblings vaguely amusing. Which is pretty much the only reason anyone on here is reading your threads and why they go for so many pages.
I am pretty sure that even the other rigtards have decided not to associate themselves with you and that my friend, is saying something.
------------
Posted by TheMachineQC: OMG!! Thanks for bringing this thread back up, I almost pissed myself like 10 times reading it
/think
Edited by jessthehuman (11 August 2011 @ 08:00 GMT)
Joined: Mar '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 6714
You see, this is just how stupid this guy is, he came back to this thread with a reply to his own quote. Now thats not the best bit, its the bit were he almost decided to wait forever as Jess had told him. arsenej1 has posted some nice stats @onlinjoke, it turns out your speech is equal to 0.86666 of his body weight. BTW when are YOU going to start posting some stats?
You see, this is just how stupid this guy is, he came back to this thread with a reply to his own quote. Now thats not the best bit, its the bit were he almost decided to wait forever as Jess had told him. arsenej1 has posted some nice stats @onlinjoke, it turns out your speech is equal to 0.86666 of his body weight. BTW when are YOU going to start posting some stats?
I already proved that poker time cheat roulette odds and that uses the same RNG. Cant find any software to track from pre flop to river but when ever I take a small sample the odds just dont add up. Again I will say why do none of the sites do any proper tests that include post hands flop, turn and river. ak verses aq has little chance if a q hits the flop yet ak appears to win it share as though this was pre flop odds?.
I do have pocket aces stats that I hand picked from 1.056 samples(heads up only) 871 won 185 lost which is about 82% win rate. So far so good.
539 Pocket aces won through default as other player folded pre leaving 517 challenged and 332 winning. Over all the true odds of aces winning is only 64%
DONT TELL ME THE MATH IS WRONG
I have requested test results that cover all aspects of the dhand deal but not one poker site will publish or ever aknkoldge they have such tets done.
Again if the industry was so honest at least one of these sites would test completely with out doubt .do these tests
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 6483
Posted by onlinejoke:
Posted by B1gfoot: You see, this is just how stupid this guy is, he came back to this thread with a reply to his own quote. Now thats not the best bit, its the bit were he almost decided to wait forever as Jess had told him. arsenej1 has posted some nice stats @onlinjoke, it turns out your speech is equal to 0.86666 of his body weight. BTW when are YOU going to start posting some stats?
I already proved that poker time cheat roulette odds and that uses the same RNG
No you didn't, you posted a link to a site that showed EXAMPLE certificates that just rated everything at 95%
They weren't actually for any real site, they were just an example to show what they looked like. What you actually did, as a result, was embarrass yourself.
Posted by B1gfoot: You see, this is just how stupid this guy is, he came back to this thread with a reply to his own quote. Now thats not the best bit, its the bit were he almost decided to wait forever as Jess had told him. arsenej1 has posted some nice stats @onlinjoke, it turns out your speech is equal to 0.86666 of his body weight. BTW when are YOU going to start posting some stats?
I already proved that poker time cheat roulette odds and that uses the same RNG
No you didn't, you posted a link to a site that showed EXAMPLE certificates that just rated everything at 95%
They weren't actually for any real site, they were just an example to show what they looked like. What you actually did, as a result, was embarrass yourself.
I do have pocket aces stats that I hand picked from 1.056 samples(heads up only) 871 won 185 lost which is about 82% win rate. So far so good.
539 Pocket aces won through default as other player folded pre leaving 517 challenged and 332 winning. Over all the true odds of aces winning is only 64%
DONT TELL ME THE MATH IS WRONG
I have requested test results that cover all aspects of the dhand deal but not one poker site will publish or ever aknkoldge they have such tets done.
Again if the industry was so honest at least one of these sites would test completely with out doubt .do these tests Edited by onlinejoke (Friday, August 12, 2011 @ 08:52 GMT)
Joined: May '09
Location: India
Age: 37 (M)
Posts: 4873
Posted by onlinejoke: I do have pocket aces stats that I hand picked from 1.056 samples(heads up only) 871 won 185 lost which is about 82% win rate. So far so good.
539 Pocket aces won through default as other player folded pre leaving 517 challenged and 332 winning. Over all the true odds of aces winning is only 64%
DONT TELL ME THE MATH IS WRONG
Math is never wrong, its people like you are wrong who have no idea what these numbers mean
regarding your data your sample is clearly biased and not representative ( as you excluded the hands that were folded)
but again it must be too much for you to comprehend
Posted by onlinejoke: I do have pocket aces stats that I hand picked from 1.056 samples(heads up only) 871 won 185 lost which is about 82% win rate. So far so good.
539 Pocket aces won through default as other player folded pre leaving 517 challenged and 332 winning. Over all the true odds of aces winning is only 64%
DONT TELL ME THE MATH IS WRONG
Math is never wrong, its people like you are wrong who have no idea what these numbers mean
regarding your data your sample is clearly biased and not representative ( as you excluded the hands that were folded)
but again it must be too much for you to comprehend
LOL you fking pr ick you cant include odds of non challanged hands, No wonder you morons believe the crap online poker sites feed you about reflective odds.
How the hell can idiots like you grasp percentage risks to create a margin advantage in a game of poker, Simple answer is you cant.
Why do you think on line players get such a battering in deep stack tournies starting with up to 1,000 players.
You cant even under stand the given odds of pocket aces winning,The odds are for challenged hands called down MUPPET.
