English flag   Dansk (danish) flag     (02:06 GMT)
 
Username   Password  

BankrollMob Christmas logo  
Free no deposit poker bonuses Reviews Bankrolls - Free No Deposit Offers Poker Forum News: Poker, Casino, Betting & Bingo Sport Bets Poker Freerolls & Tournaments Leaderboards Support & FAQ
transparent separator

BankrollMob Forum

BankrollMob Forum » Poker Strategies » AGRESSIVE VS PASSIF PLAYERS !!!

New Thread Forums Search Subscriptions Bookmarks

  11-Oct-12, 16:27   #1
AGRESSIVE VS PASSIF PLAYERS !!! 0 
CowboyQuebec 
Joined: Sep '12
Location: Canada
Age: 26 (M)
Posts: 3
AGRESSIVE PLAYER WIN AT 75 % PLAY,ITS MY CONCLUSION

Attached ImagesCapture3.PNG Capture22.PNG Capture1.PNG

     
  11-Oct-12, 18:36   #2
  0 
paulparadiis 

Joined: May '09
Location: Estonia
Age: 27 (M)
Posts: 777
I haven't been to this forum for a while, and it's nice to see that people are still really puting their minds in the posts. Great job CowboyQueen. It helped me a lot! Club

     
  11-Oct-12, 18:39   #3
  0 
Macubaas 
Joined: Apr '11
Location: Romania
Age: 27 (M)
Posts: 6668
No surprise here at all in fact, i think ll of us already new that...

The idea is to play good hands as aggressive as you can and simply fold the crap hands from the start Smile

     
  11-Oct-12, 18:43   #4
  0 
paulparadiis 

Joined: May '09
Location: Estonia
Age: 27 (M)
Posts: 777
I was being sarcastic... Club

     
  11-Oct-12, 19:32   #5
  0 
Greenmohave 

Joined: Jan '11
Location: United States
Age: 52 (M)
Posts: 3361
I opened this thread hoping to actually read something pertaining to the subject at hand. Instead there's a basic comment with no objective evidence supporting it or comments I should say. Very nice!

     
  11-Oct-12, 20:32   #6
  0 
CowboyQuebec 
Joined: Sep '12
Location: Canada
Age: 26 (M)
Posts: 3
Sorry but my opinion !!!

------------
Sorry but my opinion !!!

     
  11-Oct-12, 21:18   #7
  0 
damosk 
Joined: Feb '11
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 52 (M)
Posts: 4847
I'm not sure that what is written is an actual opinion but a statement based on very little supporting comment. It should really be described as an observation rather than an opinion. However for it to be a true observation, it would have been helpful for you to explain why it is your observation (or opinion as you call it!)

     
  11-Oct-12, 21:38   #8
  0 
CowboyQuebec 
Joined: Sep '12
Location: Canada
Age: 26 (M)
Posts: 3
But im respect PASSIVE player !!!

Edited by CowboyQuebec (Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 21:57 GMT)


     
  12-Oct-12, 01:21   #9
  0 
ayaraled 
Joined: Apr '11
Location: Philippines
Age: 39 (M)
Posts: 544
aggressive wins more and big pots nut also loss big....maybe a controlled aggression will win more....lol....sometimes i play passive if being an aggressor always puts me difficult situations....

     
  12-Oct-12, 02:54   #10
  0 
pyro91 
Joined: Aug '12
Location: Canada
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 10
oh that's right cowboy i see your name on the top of the leaderboard winning all that cash.... glad its working for ya. Blink


You play your way I'll play mine lets see who ends up on top.

     
  12-Oct-12, 03:14   #11
  0 
retribution 

Joined: Mar '11
Location: Canada
Age: 37 (M)
Posts: 1490
I dunno, 3-betting a big raise LP like that with AQs isn't good IMO. You had 97k, blinds at 6k which gives you around 17BB. Personally once LP raised, I'd either shove or fold. I'd actually say lean toward shoving since you're so short stacked, but you're going to be a flip at best. Since he's put in 1/4 of his stack with a raise, it's easier to put him on a bigger hand, unless he's a complete idiot. When someone commits a good chunk of their chips pre-flop, it's usually safe to assume that they feel strong enough to go all the way with the hand.

On that note, not sure how much AQs beats that they'd be doing that raise with. He showed up with JJ which had you as a dog, but you got lucky. At this stage you've got to rely a little on lucky flips especially when you're this short so I still don't think it was that bad of a move.

I'm assuming he 4-bet you and you guys got it all in pre?

     
  12-Oct-12, 06:28   #12
  0 
pochui 

Joined: May '08
Location: Lithuania
Age: 32 (M)
Posts: 8623
Posted by paulparadiis:
I was being sarcastic... Club

Big Smile
getting back to the thread- sure aggressive players win more than passive players- just because they have the initiative, because they win most of no action hands, where a passive player just wins the premium hands and most of the time is bleeding money waiting for those premium hands to come

     
  12-Oct-12, 12:14   #13
  0 
Sorin888 
Joined: Apr '11
Location: Romania
Age: 51 (M)
Posts: 2375
The tight-aggressive style is the epitomy of perfect self-control. This is known to be the only lucrative style of poker.
The tight-aggressive style is contradictory. On the one hand, it is necessary to hold back, but behave decisively and aggressively when playing.The TAG can always pull the emergency brakes on the turn or river when he realizes that he is defeated.

     
  12-Oct-12, 18:12   #14
  0 
rbdflyboy 

Joined: Apr '11
Location: Canada
Age: 60 (M)
Posts: 1222
take you haven't lost with monster hands lately...recently holding AA flopped an 4A4...boat only to lose to quad 4's. So yes aggro wins and loses also. Worked out for you this time, which is good, when it doesn't you may see aggro style is situation dependent.

     
  12-Oct-12, 19:00   #15
  0 
Macubaas 
Joined: Apr '11
Location: Romania
Age: 27 (M)
Posts: 6668
Posted by Sorin888:
The tight-aggressive style is the epitomy of perfect self-control. This is known to be the only lucrative style of poker.
The tight-aggressive style is contradictory. On the one hand, it is necessary to hold back, but behave decisively and aggressively when playing.The TAG can always pull the emergency brakes on the turn or river when he realizes that he is defeated.

I think this is actually the best conclusion of this thread..

Even if you are an aggressive player but you play even the trash on long term you'll be a loosing player, so it's also very important to have a good hand selection!

     
  14-Oct-12, 23:44   #16
  0 
Predator1447 
Joined: Oct '12
Location: Belarus
Age: 30 (M)
Posts: 42
As for me,i hate mega agressive players.For example if you have AK and A83 on the board,you get big reraise for your raise.And all other streets you only call raises of your agressive opponent,and you are afraid he have set.And you see that your opponent had only small overpair.Why They are play so that??? Aww crap! Aww crap! Aww crap! Shock

     
  15-Oct-12, 01:02   #17
  0 
jessthehuman 

Joined: Apr '09
Location: Australia
Age: 32 (M)
Posts: 6441
Posted by Predator1447:
....For example if you have AK and A83 on the board...And you see that your opponent had only small overpair....



Your opponent had an over-pair (small?) on an A high board?

     
  15-Oct-12, 08:04   #18
  0 
thefly131 
Joined: Jun '10
Location: Belgium
Age: 43 (M)
Posts: 1343
In my opinion the pre-flop 3-bet with AQ was not very wise.

I would just have called the big reraise of your opponent preflop. After you hit on the flop you better placed a big raise there.

Just the question what you would have done if you did not hit a pair on the flop, or with a flop like KQ2 or AJ7 or any flop with no A or Q , that would have costs you a lot.

second remark , I can not think of 1 reason that player 7 calls preflop and especially postflop

     
  15-Oct-12, 14:34   #19
  0 
Doarulle 
Joined: Sep '12
Location: Romania
Age: 26 (M)
Posts: 1052
Nice play, re-raise pre-flop, c-bet on the flop with top pair... i don't have what to comment, that is how i've played if i had that cards and that flop Big Smile have you win ? waiting for updates, thank you and wish you good luck

     
BankrollMob Forum » Poker Strategies » AGRESSIVE VS PASSIF PLAYERS !!!

 
Forum Rules | Support & FAQ

© 2016 BankrollMob.com - All Rights Reserved CONTACT | ABOUT | PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS & CONDITIONS | NEWSLETTERS | AFFILIATES | REPORT SPAM | ADVERTISING
  Bookmark and Share