Joined: Nov '08
Location: United States
Age: 58 (M)
Posts: 155
I played some hands a little funky, and was up and down in $, but got a 120. I should try it again, but play serious, just to see if I improve. If it is always the same test, then would be results skewed...
Joined: Apr '09
Location: Portugal
Age: 42 (M)
Posts: 401
I got 131... WOW!!! Excellent result for a fixed limit player who only played less than 1k no limit hands during the last 3 months. But let's be reasonable, the deck was hot and the field was soft. I played it almost 100% straightforward.
Joined: Nov '08
Location: Malaysia
Age: 36 (M)
Posts: 151
LOL I think this test is not very accurate... i think that what it says is actually a gimmick to entice you to take on its offer to pay hehehe... anyway its a pretty cool stimulation and someone should not only make a test but training software this way.. can make pretty lots of cash
Joined: Jan '09
Location: Italy
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 3871
117 for me, but did the same mistake as MrMan and didn't checked opponents name to have the rifht reads on them. played, and lost, either QQ and JJ hands I'm unable to fold faced pairs if there aren't overcard on board....
Joined: Mar '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 36
i thought i ha done well the 1st time and got 122, then tried again thought i had done better but then only got 101. lol. could tell most hands were set up. near the end was dealt 73 and flopped 337 lololol