Joined: Mar '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 6714
Posted by M3turbo: Yes I ment bank or such with safety net. I don't think theres any refunds if your Neteller/Moneybookers/pokeraccount gets hacked. I moved my $ when it got to 2 digits for security reasons.
Edit: and ofcourse the % doesn't hurt either
Yep . But also would add, 3/4 of you money is basically never in play with you on 11 sng you may as well just take the 3/4 out and either put it to use or spend it. Even in a savings account at %5 its atleast earning. Unless your gonna p your stakes. I actually wouldnot advise NL100 4 U, id say NL50 max, if your getting most of your money from RB and deposit deals then i think it wold be hard for you to break these tables. But do get of them DoNs. GL
Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 6197
Posted by B1gfoot: Yep . But also would add, 3/4 of you money is basically never in play with you on 11 sng you may as well just take the 3/4 out and either put it to use or spend it. Even in a savings account at %5 its atleast earning. Unless your gonna p your stakes. I actually wouldnot advise NL100 4 U, id say NL50 max, if your getting most of your money from RB and deposit deals then i think it wold be hard for you to break these tables. But do get of them DoNs. GL
Well yeh allready thought bout banking but wot bout tax I have no clue
Not most off my money are from RB ect its 60/40 profit/RB sometin like that I am convident i can make profit on NL100 fullring but yeh maybe better start at NL50 as a rookie
Joined: Dec '07
Location: Denmark
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 2644
Posted by B1gfoot:
Posted by M3turbo: Yes I ment bank or such with safety net. I don't think theres any refunds if your Neteller/Moneybookers/pokeraccount gets hacked. I moved my $ when it got to 2 digits for security reasons.
Edit: and ofcourse the % doesn't hurt either
I actually wouldnot advise NL100 4 U, id say NL50 max, if your getting most of your money from RB and deposit deals then i think it wold be hard for you to break these tables. But do get of them DoNs. GL
Agreed....picking level should be done based on skills and not roll. Learning session will become very expensive @NL100. I might take it as far as start @NL25 play a decent amount of hands if you got a decent winrate step up.....that would be my approach.
Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 6197
Lol my reply was 1 sec earlier Yeh NL100 maybe too big step agreed Also when i wud start cash it wud be with a coach, i have contact with good 1 on NL200/NL400 for $30 an hour
Joined: Dec '07
Location: Denmark
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 2644
Posted by doomdy:
Posted by B1gfoot: Yep . But also would add, 3/4 of you money is basically never in play with you on 11 sng you may as well just take the 3/4 out and either put it to use or spend it. Even in a savings account at %5 its atleast earning. Unless your gonna p your stakes. I actually wouldnot advise NL100 4 U, id say NL50 max, if your getting most of your money from RB and deposit deals then i think it wold be hard for you to break these tables. But do get of them DoNs. GL
Well yeh allready thought bout banking but wot bout tax I have no clue
Not most off my money are from RB ect its 60/40 profit/RB sometin like that I am convident i can make profit on NL100 fullring but yeh maybe better start at NL50 as a rookie
Doomdy as I said before you really need to get your tax laws straight. No matter how they are you wont gain or lose less by keeping them in your pokeraccount unless you are planning on a swiss bank account(tax fraud).
------------
Posted by doomdy: Lol my reply was 1 sec earlier Yeh NL100 maybe too big step agreed Also when i wud start cash it wud be with a coach, i have contact with good 1 on NL200/NL400 for $30 an hour
Unless he is a friend....I doubt he is a good NL200-400 player if he rents him self out for lousy $30/h I would def be sceptical.
Joined: May '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 53 (M)
Posts: 6197
Posted by M3turbo: Doomdy as I said before you really need to get your tax laws straight. No matter how they are you wont gain or lose less by keeping them in your pokeraccount unless you are planning on a swiss bank account(tax fraud).
True, i allready contacted a friend of mine, he is a taxman (dunno wots it called), i trust him, i told him my story, also told him i never withdraw so some intrest wud be fine. So hopefully he can advise me with some good offers
------------
Posted by M3turbo: Unless he is a friend....I doubt he is a good NL200-400 player if he rents him self out for lousy $30/h I would def be sceptical.
Yeh a semi - friend, i saw his stats and they really good, he taking shots now at NL1000.
Joined: Mar '08
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 44 (M)
Posts: 6714
Dont play games with the tax man, some of your guys got busted eairly this year if I remember right. Find out what you should be paying, my guess would be 30% over there. But im sure there is a way around it something to do with none rakeback sites.
.
I have no clue 
