Joined: May '09
Location: Estonia
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 777
i had a ndb to party a long time ago, and i noticed that if you play a 1$ sit&go, they take 0.30$ from it as rake. I think that's the reason why they put the entry and the rake together, so people wudn't see that, because it's just sick. I cleared my bonus and got out of that place.
Joined: May '08
Location: Germany
Age: 59 (M)
Posts: 6787
Posted by paulparadiis: i had a ndb to party a long time ago, and i noticed that if you play a 1$ sit&go, they take 0.30$ from it as rake. I think that's the reason why they put the entry and the rake together, so people wudn't see that, because it's just sick. I cleared my bonus and got out of that place.
Yep. Rake at the low stakes SnGs is insanly high at Party.
Posted by schwabo: Party Poker is s**t, I play FTP all the time and think is the best
Compared to FTP, indeed PP is way far better but PP has its advantages... such as sportsbetting, Bingo etc... games a lot of people like to try for fun... yes I do also agree that the rake is so high and it's indeed not good for the customers
Joined: Mar '10
Location: Germany
Age: 37 (M)
Posts: 69
Posted by shokaku:
Posted by paulparadiis: i had a ndb to party a long time ago, and i noticed that if you play a 1$ sit&go, they take 0.30$ from it as rake. I think that's the reason why they put the entry and the rake together, so people wudn't see that, because it's just sick. I cleared my bonus and got out of that place.
Yep. Rake at the low stakes SnGs is insanly high at Party.
Jep, too much rake, also very few Partypoints which disappear!!!! after a while so you can't even buy in to a freeroll tournament -.-
Joined: May '09
Location: Estonia
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 777
But the good things are the weekly 300K$ and mothly million tournaments. The buy in is big, but there are many times less players than in PS or FT. I once qualified for the weekley 300K$ for 50 party points, and there were ~1300 players and i cashed about 400$. That was fun!
