Joined: May '13
Location: Mauritius
Age: 33 (M)
Posts: 2688
Hmm no idea on limit holdem and fixed games, but for holdem i know the good win rates for the Nl2 where i play, if you play 9 max 6-8bb per 100 is a good one if you play 6 max it is a bit more higher but there is variance if you do not play and the win rates is like 10-12bb if done correctly anyway good luck mate on your poker journey hope to see you succeed and make some money on poker. Cheer peace out mate and have fun!
Joined: Feb '11
Location: Germany
Age: 32 (M)
Posts: 1859
What Heskor wrote sounds about right. Though I'd think on fullring higher winrates can be achieved than on 6 max at that pirticular level. You will be able to squeeze out value on fullring tables so much because there are loads of family pots. This all only if you are playing reasonable though. On 0.05/0.10 I'm sure your winrate will already start to shrink, because there are alreay some regulars playing that stake.
My overall winrate on 6-max NL4 is about 37.3 bb/100 (played 40762 hands), but over the last 10000 hands it's about 60 bb/100.
I recently read an article that made a breakdown, looks like I might be beating that by some margin, but I'm only single tabling (copied from article): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Top win rates possible for elite players who play 1-8 tables.
Joined: Feb '11
Location: Germany
Age: 32 (M)
Posts: 1859
The thread is about limit holdem, not NLH.Also, where did you read the article? I don't play cashgames, but I read blogs and such stuff alot, of good,very deeply thinking players, and some numbers (especially on the low tabling-lowstakes winrates) some numbers seem to be largely made up. But wow, 36.7BB/100 over 40K hands? That's huge. You should def. give NL10 a try and I'm sure you'll beat that at good winrate.
Posted by BeMyATMplz: The thread is about limit holdem, not NLH.Also, where did you read the article? I don't play cashgames, but I read blogs and such stuff alot, of good,very deeply thinking players, and some numbers (especially on the low tabling-lowstakes winrates) some numbers seem to be largely made up. But wow, 36.7BB/100 over 40K hands? That's huge. You should def. give NL10 a try and I'm sure you'll beat that at good winrate.
I briefly tried NL10, and it went well (very small sample), but I'm kind of waiting for the other shoe to drop (i.e. the inevitable downswing). I'd rather have that happen on NL4. Did I mention I'm "chicken"?
Joined: Mar '14
Location: Japan
Age: 50 (M)
Posts: 8946
Stats on higher stakes (not a Mickey Mouse stake). *Just for comparison Where are you, BlackPete? Hey, you recognize some of the bots I mentioned in earlier posts? They are from the same countries.
10,000 hands per day??? This certainly suggests boots. But is poker rooms do not watch this? It's against the rules! And judging by your posts to fix it easily !! In general, I will refrain from commenting ...
Posted by pajalnick: 10,000 hands per day??? This certainly suggests boots. But is poker rooms do not watch this? It's against the rules! And judging by your posts to fix it easily !! In general, I will refrain from commenting ...
It's a lot, but at 100 hands/hour per table, you'd need to play 10 tables for 10 hours. Not impossible, but you might as well get a job at a factory assembly line...
