BankrollMob Poker News


Barry Greenstein On Re-Entry Tournaments & More...

Tags: 2014 WSOP, Barry Greenstein, poker hall of fame, PokerStars, re-entry tournaments.
Posted on 22 May 2014 by "T".

Poker Hall Of Fame member and Team PokerStars Pro Barry Greenstein has been around the poker scene (with huge success) for a very long time and many consider him a living legend thanks to his contributions to the game. Already back in 1991, Barry made so much money playing poker that he was able to retire from his day job to become a full-time poker pro instead.

Besides being a very good cash game player in the past 3 decades, he has also had a lot of success playing poker tournaments - including 3 WSOP bracelets and 2 WPT titles! According to hendonmob, his live tournament earnings exceed $8,000,000 as of today! Off the table, Barry has written a poker strategy book named ‘Ace on the River' and, perhaps the most important aspect of his career, he donates a large portion of his tournament winnings to chairty.  

If you are a fan of Barry "Robin Hood Of Poker" Greenstein, like us here at BankrollMob, then you will definitely enjoy his latest blog on live poker tournaments with re-entry, the 2014 World Series of Poker, and more! Enjoy!

I have only played about five tournaments this year, most notably the PCA Main Event, The Aussie Millions Main Event, the WPT Main Events at the Commerce Casino and Bay 101, and the EPT Monte Carlo Main Event.

I didn't cash in any of those events and although there have been several other major tournaments on the east cost of the U.S. and in Europe, I chose to stay closer to home and play a lot of live cash games. So many main events these days have unlimited re-entries and I am not as excited to play in those. I'm not claiming these re-entry tournaments aren't good for tournament poker because they allow people to play at different price points, but I just don't like them from a competitive standpoint.

In a sense, re-entry tournaments aren't true poker. I think of a poker tournament as a competition where the playing field is level.

However, in re-entry events, players with deeper pockets are able to fire off a bunch of bullets and have a better shot to make the final table than those who can only afford to buy in once. If I wanted an uneven playing field, I'd sit in a cash game, where some players are comfortable with the stakes and others are taking a shot.

In tournaments, I always hoped that everyone would have access. Players with small bankrolls could satellite into big buy-in events and still feel like they had the same chance of winning the tournament. It's one of the things I really like about poker and what makes it every man's game. Everyone has the opportunity to play against the best players in the world and sometimes come out ahead of them.

If I decided to play a re-entry tournament and wanted to compete with everyone and try to win, I'd better have five or even ten bullets to fire. If the money didn't matter to me, I suppose I would fire off like that, but money does matter to me at this point. And even if I could do it, it also makes me think--is this the right way to play poker? What am I doing just firing off, playing a way I wouldn't normally play just to try and get a hold of a lot of chips? That's not playing poker in the most effective way; it's trying to get my name on the leader board in the most effective way.

Another thought I had about tournaments is that I don't really consider it a tournament if the field has fewer than 100 entries. I always thought of tournaments as a way to take a small amount of money and turn it into a very large amount of money, maybe 50 or 100 times your buy-in. If a tournament has fewer than 100 entries, the amount you can potentially make compared to the buy-in isn't that great. It will always be an amount you could attain in a cash game with the same skill level or run of cards. A tournament score should be something you can't accomplish in a cash game. I also believe that the overall tournament money list shouldn't include events with fewer than 100 players. It's not a selfish move-- it would actually come at the expense of my own standing on the list. I have won events that had fewer than 100 players, most notably a million-dollar, winner-take-all seven-card stud tournament where the buy-in was $125,000.

I had a good time at the EPT Monte Carlo but I'm back in Los Angeles now, playing cash games until I leave for the World Series of Poker. The WSOP is only a week away and I intend to play about 20-25 events this year. I hope to see you there.

source: pokerstarsblog

« Poker News   /   Comment on this news »

Related Articles:

10 comments on "Barry Greenstein On Re-Entry Tournaments & More..."

 doubletop77722/05/2014 09:20:45 GMT
I must agree with Barry about not liking rebuy tournaments. The players with the deeper pockets have a distinct advantage and tournament poker is all about starting with the same and seeing the best man win
 mahdrof22/05/2014 09:41:30 GMT
My favourite poker player of all time, a winning player at cash and tournaments, different variations of poker, and across multiple generations of players. The Robin Hood of poker has also been good for its image. Worship Worship Worship Worship Worship
 Heskor22/05/2014 14:45:31 GMT
Yeah i love Barry as a player too love his post, i remember his post about his gold skills and where he gave it up because he has no love for it anymore so he stick with poker for that long and guess he loves the game too much. So good luck to him in any tournament he is in. Also I would like to say that re entry tournament sucks if it is online as too much donkey. Live is another matter!
 ddblt197023/05/2014 08:48:55 GMT
Great article, but why does the interview have to be written white? My eyes hurt...

To the topic: Rebuy tournaments should be played (with corresponding bankrollmanagement) as standart freezeout tournaments, but with 4 times as big buy in. (for 3$ +rebuy tournament you need bankrollmanagement as for 12$ tournaments).
Because when you play them, you should always take the rebuy right away (to have double stack) and then always take the addon. (+sometimes if you bust, you can double rebuy).
By playing a rebuy tournament like that, you maximize your profits!
 xgcsnippy23/05/2014 12:51:29 GMT
I played a rebuy satellite last night, 5 fpps buyin for a
Sunday storm ticket. I won it with only my single buyin, field was only 207 players
However it's my 4 th ticket this week from fpp points.

I personally hate rebuys and plan on one addons only,
I will rebuy if I had the monster hand taken out by crap, then to
Me it's war and I want another chance.
 Macubaas23/05/2014 15:54:44 GMT
Barry is firstly a great guy more than a great poker player. He has good relatiosn with all poker players but stayed away from dirty business!

His advices are of course precious for every poker player, a new or a more experimented one.
 vic7523/05/2014 16:34:54 GMT
Barry Greenstein a great player and donates a lot of his winnings too charity Thumbs Up Thumbs Up agree with him on the rebuy it's not for me or the add on Greenstein a great Ambassador for the game of Poker Thumbs Up Thumbs Up
 ddblt197024/05/2014 17:11:42 GMT
Barry is a great player.

I am always sad when he gets a suckout.
 noonlion24/05/2014 21:50:50 GMT
Yes. My thoughts exactly.

I fucking hate the re-entries in any tournament. It gives donks and well bankrolled players an edge to keep coming back and eventually bink a series of hands and them steamroll a tournament.

Buy-in and cash out, none of this choppy-pot and re-entry bawgagedness.
 ddblt197026/05/2014 09:28:24 GMT
I don´t have anything against rebuy tournaments, but as you say, standart freezeout tournaments feel more like a proper poker tournament.

Write a comment:

You must be logged in, to comment on news...

Disclosure: BankrollMob may earn a commission based on the advertisement material on this site. #AD

  Please Play Responsibly