BankrollMob Forum

BankrollMob Forum » Hand Histories » JOKERstars at its best


Page 3 of 3Go to page: « Previous  1, 2, 3  

   +1   
LOL @ gwahamy , i am so sowwy sir, next time ill twy harder Worship


Just to get youre saturday night kicking off a cool clip.......



May the evil pokergod in green pants shine his light on you ..... have a great weekend all.... Worship

     
   +1   
Posted by grahamy27:
Posted by 8wall:
hey there remco,

"Now you forse me to explain the obvious wich only makes you look like a douchebag."
------
I believe the correct spelling is FORCE

"Btw Jess insults lots of people so i dont feel bad ...just trying to stick up for those who get stamped on for no reason .."

and the correct term for this is STOMPED , unless u were reffering to sending those people by mail...

Atleast u tried and i give u a B minus , if u try harder next time maybe u get a gold star.....

I am starting to think belieber was a freudian slip since the little bugger is in our country this weekend ,now get youre hands out of youre undies and focus more on youre spelling.

Big Smile

May the pokergods shine on all of us



STAMPED is the correct term Blink in your last paragraph the word is YOUR not YOURE just pointing out your spelling mistakes as you have done to Remco Blink
i'll give you a B minus this time but work harder and i will award you a gold star... Thumbs Up Big Smile LOL


Thank you very much Grahamy27 ...very funny but you didnt need to do it..
I dont care about my spelling and dont check it ...as long as people understand what i am saying i am ok.
They can correct me if they feel the need to do so ...dont care even a little..

But again i was LOL when you corrected 8wall's spelling in the post he made about correcting my spelling.. Big Smile Big Smile Big Smile tooooo funny

8wall you made yourself look like a douche Tongue

     
   +1   
HEY!!! Ya learn something NEW everyday... Thumbs Up

I know there's tons of folks out there who claim PokerStars and other sites are rigged,....but I never knew there was a term for them...

That term being: Rigtard...

lol...

I'm not siding with anybody in this 'discussion'. Remaining neutral here,....but I don't think PS or FT riggs anything.... Maybe other smaller flim flam sites,...I don't know...

Have fun bickering there boys... lol... Smile

     
   0   
Graham if you get out of the blind rage you are in you will see i didnt call you a rigtard jess did. What i said was you've been coming here providing dubious evidence as to why its rigged as long as i have been coming here. Whether you think thats what you were saying or not. It could easily be thought by anyone that thats what you were insinuating. I can reply to any thread i feel like, I'm not banned from your threads, and in saying that you sound like the total loser that you are.

------------
Stomped and stamped are the same thing.

     
   +1   
Posted by grahamy27:
another dumbass, when have i said it is rigged?? when have i ever posted that poker is rigged??



Posted by grahamy27:
Posted by PokerDonV73:
Yes buddy, if you pay attention long enough you can predict what card is coming, and especially WHEN you will be busted. People will say you are paranoid and it's just a downswing and that it's variance. I always say if you go outside at 9am and a bird shits on your head , its coincidence; if the next day you go out at the same time and that same bird shits on your head again, you can say wow that really is a coincidence. But when the 3rd day he shits on your head again, you know it is NOT coincidence. So many will still say it is conncidence. Those are the really stupid ones. They believe anything.



hmm really good insight, definitely 1 way of looking at it, and i totally agree Thumbs Up




Maybe I lack the ability to comprehend plain English, I'm sorry if I am mistaken, but when I read this it appear, to me at least, that PokerDon was implying the hands weren't random at PokerStars and it appeared, once again, to me at least, that you were in agreement.

------------
Anyway, I accept you're not a rigtard. I concede and I'm sorry- although you should note, it's not hard to make the mistake given some of your posts, particularly using rigtard terminology such as "joker stars" - I know you think it's a common community term, but it is so, generally only for rigtards, why do you think they call it 'joker' stars?

Anyway, regardless of all that. I stand my ground in saying that this particular hand is hardly a 'joke' or a 'bad beat' or anything else worth having a sook about.. a blind vs blind battle, with both players under 10bb and both holding aces.. it's so ridiculously standard its not even funny and as I've already pointed out, you win this hand, statistically, less than 66% (two thirds) of the time. So.. I mean, it's not that far off making a thread about losing a flip.

------------
I am genuinely sorry for calling you (or implying you were) a rigtard, however. I do admit that was my mistake and I am sorry.

Edited by jessthehuman (14 April 2013 @ 09:07 GMT)


     
   0   
Posted by 8wall:
LOL @ gwahamy , i am so sowwy sir, next time ill twy harder Worship


Just to get youre saturday night kicking off a cool clip.......



May the evil pokergod in green pants shine his light on you ..... have a great weekend all.... Worship



lol, thanks Thumbs Up

------------
Posted by jessthehuman:
Posted by grahamy27:
another dumbass, when have i said it is rigged?? when have i ever posted that poker is rigged??



Posted by grahamy27:
Posted by PokerDonV73:
Yes buddy, if you pay attention long enough you can predict what card is coming, and especially WHEN you will be busted. People will say you are paranoid and it's just a downswing and that it's variance. I always say if you go outside at 9am and a bird shits on your head , its coincidence; if the next day you go out at the same time and that same bird shits on your head again, you can say wow that really is a coincidence. But when the 3rd day he shits on your head again, you know it is NOT coincidence. So many will still say it is conncidence. Those are the really stupid ones. They believe anything.



hmm really good insight, definitely 1 way of looking at it, and i totally agree Thumbs Up




Maybe I lack the ability to comprehend plain English, I'm sorry if I am mistaken, but when I read this it appear, to me at least, that PokerDon was implying the hands weren't random at PokerStars and it appeared, once again, to me at least, that you were in agreement.

------------
Anyway, I accept you're not a rigtard. I concede and I'm sorry- although you should note, it's not hard to make the mistake given some of your posts, particularly using rigtard terminology such as "joker stars" - I know you think it's a common community term, but it is so, generally only for rigtards, why do you think they call it 'joker' stars?

Anyway, regardless of all that. I stand my ground in saying that this particular hand is hardly a 'joke' or a 'bad beat' or anything else worth having a sook about.. a blind vs blind battle, with both players under 10bb and both holding aces.. it's so ridiculously standard its not even funny and as I've already pointed out, you win this hand, statistically, less than 66% (two thirds) of the time. So.. I mean, it's not that far off making a thread about losing a flip.

------------
I am genuinely sorry for calling you (or implying you were) a rigtard, however. I do admit that was my mistake and I am sorry.



ok, thanks Jess.i understand that i was only slightly ahead, the main reason i made the post was to vent a bit of frustration as i was still in another tourney and didnt want to have that on my chest whilst playing, as i previously stated i understand it is a coinflip but it wasnt just battle of the blinds as there was 2/3 players to act after him, i also understand isolation is good but nit wit rag A, thats just my opinion though,
i just remember an old saying that a problem shared is a problem halved, which is why i voice my grievance elsewhere than rather have it on poker table.

i also accept apology for the rigtard remark as i know online poker isnt rigged! but it doesnt stop the board from being predictable, i have played for long enough to know when certain situations are going to occur,(i guess its like watching the lotto and you feel no. 27 is going to come and it does.LOL)

and for anyone else reading this online poker is the fairest type of online betting, its the only game where house doesnt have an edge!

------------
Posted by sadamman:
Graham if you get out of the blind rage you are in you will see i didnt call you a rigtard jess did. What i said was you've been coming here providing dubious evidence as to why its rigged as long as i have been coming here. Whether you think thats what you were saying or not. It could easily be thought by anyone that thats what you were insinuating. I can reply to any thread i feel like, I'm not banned from your threads, and in saying that you sound like the total loser that you are.

------------
Stomped and stamped are the same thing.



you basically called me a rigtard, as you said i have 5 posts with the title jokerstars, the reason i dont post evidence of it being rigged is probably due to the fact that i dont think it is rigged!!

i post hands that i feel i have had a bad deal, that doesnt constitute that i am a rigtard or that i think poker is rigged!

stomped and stamped are kind of the same thing but when used in that context stamped is the right word not stomped!

http://www.beedictionary.com/common-errors/stomp_vs_stamp have a read

ps, im not in a blind rage,llf. as previously stated once problem is aired i feel no anger, i havnt been angry during this post with anyones comments apart from when being called a rigtard when i have completely the opposite views on online poker!

pps. i sound like a loser? if you remember correctly you were the one that stated i should be banned, so are you a loser also?

Edited by grahamy27 (14 April 2013 @ 14:14 GMT)


     
   0   
Whatever man, stomped and stamped are the same thing, they are synonymous. Don't nit pick. I'm not arguing with you no more what I've said is right and no matter what you say you will not change my mind on that. Yeh you should be banned because of the remark about jess wanting to bum me. You might not be a rigtard, you might not have been insinuating you think its rigged. But i think you were and no amount of aggression will make me think other wise or make me apologize to you. One thing is for sure, you're a cunt.

------------
Not once have i lowered myself to personal insults until now, you have done it a plethora of times in that time. Thats why you should be banned.

     
   0   
Posted by sadamman:
Whatever man, stomped and stamped are the same thing, they are synonymous. Don't nit pick. I'm not arguing with you no more what I've said is right and no matter what you say you will not change my mind on that. Yeh you should be banned because of the remark about jess wanting to bum me. You might not be a rigtard, you might not have been insinuating you think its rigged. But i think you were and no amount of aggression will make me think other wise or make me apologize to you. One thing is for sure, you're a cunt.

------------
Not once have i lowered myself to personal insults until now, you have done it a plethora of times in that time. Thats why you should be banned.


listen im no longer going to respond to you, as you are just a sad little man!

Edited by grahamy27 (14 April 2013 @ 15:07 GMT)


     
   0   
Posted by sadamman:
Whatever man, stomped and stamped are the same thing, they are synonymous. Don't nit pick. I'm not arguing with you no more what I've said is right and no matter what you say you will not change my mind on that. Yeh you should be banned because of the remark about jess wanting to bum me. You might not be a rigtard, you might not have been insinuating you think its rigged. But i think you were and no amount of aggression will make me think other wise or make me apologize to you. One thing is for sure, you're a cunt.

------------
Not once have i lowered myself to personal insults until now, you have done it a plethora of times in that time. Thats why you should be banned.


You insulted me plenty times before...so you lower yourself to personal insults more then you remember ....

     
   0   
I meant on this thread you mong.

     
   0   
today I played in the privilage freeroll and a huy just flopped quads 2 time in a row....I just do not understand why they set it up like this.....quads in a tournament is very hard to get...offcourse that is because the deck is manually shuffled....but still...there should be a program that stops players from getting 2 incredible hands one after another...

     
   0   
Posted by CipciganDM:
today I played in the privilage freeroll and a huy just flopped quads 2 time in a row....I just do not understand why they set it up like this.....quads in a tournament is very hard to get...offcourse that is because the deck is manually shuffled....but still...there should be a program that stops players from getting 2 incredible hands one after another...


Just rubbish. That's the nature of poker. DONT LIKE, DONT PLAY.
Go play something that you actually enjoy!

     
   +1   
Posted by CipciganDM:
today I played in the privilage freeroll and a huy just flopped quads 2 time in a row....I just do not understand why they set it up like this.....quads in a tournament is very hard to get...offcourse that is because the deck is manually shuffled....but still...there should be a program that stops players from getting 2 incredible hands one after another...


sooo.. you don't believe it's a fix, but you believe it SHOULD be fixed, to make hand-distribution more fair?

Seriously, not quite sure whether or not you're being sarcastic.. can never tell on the internet.

     
   0   
Posted by jessthehuman:
Posted by CipciganDM:
today I played in the privilage freeroll and a huy just flopped quads 2 time in a row....I just do not understand why they set it up like this.....quads in a tournament is very hard to get...offcourse that is because the deck is manually shuffled....but still...there should be a program that stops players from getting 2 incredible hands one after another...


sooo.. you don't believe it's a fix, but you believe it SHOULD be fixed, to make hand-distribution more fair?

Seriously, not quite sure whether or not you're being sarcastic.. can never tell on the internet.


This calls for a sarcasm smiley. I should get cracking on paint.

     
   0   
Posted by JWRowell:
This calls for a sarcasm smiley. I should get cracking on paint.


Do it. The Internet will thank you!

     
Page 3 of 3Go to page: « Previous  1, 2, 3  

BankrollMob Forum » Hand Histories » JOKERstars at its best

 
Forum Rules | Support & FAQ

Disclosure: BankrollMob may earn a commission based on the advertisement material on this site. #AD

© 2024 BankrollMob.com - All Rights Reserved CONTACT | ABOUT | PRIVACY & COOKIE POLICY | TERMS & CONDITIONS | NEWSLETTER | AFFILIATES | REPORT SPAM | ADVERTISING
  Please Play Responsibly