A super grinder has earned $107,000 on micro-limit tables where the average buy-in is around $6. He has been seen on 43 tables at the same time on PokerStars. How is this possible many people have been questioning themselves?
Milesaway558 has really got many people`s attention lately when he been killing the game on the micro-limits at PokerStars and made over hundred thousand dollars by playing [...] Read more » Milesaway558: A bot or a genius?
Joined: Jan '08
Location: Croatia
Age: 47 (M)
Posts: 1308
He can win money, after all he has stats to prove that but that is not poker. That`s some math game with elements of multilevel marketing. Numbers over quality.
Joined: Dec '07
Location: Denmark
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 2644
Predobar spot on.
Can this guy prove his results when I sharkscope him he has $16K profit, not $107K.
------------
Posted by Whiskerer: Sure someone could beat him at maybe even 8 tables, at which point he is still killing at 17 tables, so imo he's still got you.
You got something wrong out of 43 tables he is killing none of them he is playing str8 forward and living of people mistakes which there are plenty of at 6$ tables. He doesn't dominate(killing) any of the tables, more like marginal winner but with the extreme number of tables it turns into cash.
Joined: Apr '08
Location: Sweden
Age: 35 (M)
Posts: 188
Regardless of semantics, my point remains valid, you can maybe beat him on a few tables, but that is still a minority of what he is playing. Besides, it seems you have got something wrong, sharkscope only covers tournaments.
Joined: Dec '07
Location: Denmark
Age: 40 (M)
Posts: 2644
Posted by Whiskerer: Regardless of semantics, my point remains valid, you can maybe beat him on a few tables, but that is still a minority of what he is playing. Besides, it seems you have got something wrong, sharkscope only covers tournaments.
Nothing wrong here, I asked if he could prove his results cause sharkscope only said $16K and as I understand it his maingame is 6$ S&G.
I'll cut it out for you so you understand. When I ask if he can prove it, it meens has anyone seen any evidence of these results if not from sharkscope then graphs from HEM/PT.
Joined: Jun '08
Location: Italy
Age: 41 (M)
Posts: 411
My records is 12 tables in the mean time but i had a lot of troubles because i organized them all next to each other so they were sooo smal... i think the best option is to have 2 30" monitors
Joined: Nov '08
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46 (M)
Posts: 18
this smells like b******t if you ask me 43 tables man i mean..come on with 4 you go crazy cause when you want to raise with one the other comes..and another so 43 seems impossible to me can't be done trust me.....
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Denmark
Age: 34 (M)
Posts: 1
I dont think its possible to make that good a bot. If you have a Bot you will win some if you are lucky - but in the long run you will lose? Havent heard of a bot that works anyways =)
Obviously both I don't think he's a human being as no human can master 43 tables at the same time in poker & the worst make a profit of 100k. Come on ...
Joined: Aug '08
Location: Australia
Age: 51 (M)
Posts: 1418
i dont think its possible to play that many tables, if it were possible the tables would have to be 10 seaters which he may do, but it has to be a bot, are bots legal??
I don't think he's a human being as no human can master 43 tables at the same time in 
